by Hope Yen, Associated Press
|
May 6, 2004
WASHINGTON -- Retrofitting electronic voting machines with paper receipts in time for this year's presidential election would cause chaos far worse than the security concerns it is intended to address, election officials said yesterday in the first hearing of the federal Election Assistance Commission.
|
Commentary:
Yeah, trust us.
You don't need a paper trail.
Receipts would introduce
'chaos' into the presidential election.
=Phil= |
|
|
The receipts have been sought as a backstop against computer errors, crashes, or tampering. The seven- hour hearing -- the first of the new commission, formed in the wake of the controversy over the presidential recount in 2000 -- brought together computer specialists, election officials, and advocacy groups to begin work on a national policy on electronic voting security.
Waving a 37-inch-long receipt that would be needed for each voter on a complicated ballot, Los Angeles election chief Conny McCormack said making voters pore over the cryptic printout with small type would guarantee confusion. ''Touch screens have a proven track record of doing the best job," she said. ''Voters are confident in these systems. There's only a tiny, vocal minority making false claims to the contrary."
California Secretary of State Kevin Shelley, however, disputed McCormack's claim, saying he followed the unanimous recommendation of his policy panel when he decertified touch-screen equipment last week. ''I would not base my decision on the false claims of a tiny minority," he said.
Congress is also considering several proposals, including one by Representative Rush Holt, Democrat of New Jersey, that would mandate paper receipts for electronic machines in this November's election. Holt appeared outside the hearing, joined by supporters from TrueMajority, Common Cause, and TrueVoteMD, which are demanding the paper receipts, and said pressure from such grass-roots groups is giving momentum to reforms. Paper receipts, he said, ''could be ready for this year's election."
Shelley urged the commission to join him in immediately setting standards for the paper printouts. The commissioners have focused on procedures designed to avoid the kind of chaos that occurred in Florida four years ago, but said before the hearing they had no intention of trying to move as quickly as Shelley urged.
Civic groups split over paper printouts. Common Cause and the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation testified in favor of receipts to restore confidence in elections. But the National Council of La Raza, the League of Women Voters, and the American Association of People With Disabilities all said that electronic voting reduces voter error and helps the disabled and people who don't speak English. Adding the unproven and relatively untested paper receipts could drive away such groups, they said.
Commissioners expressed concerns about the behind-the-scenes power of equipment vendors.
Chairman DeForest ''Buster" Soaries Jr. noted that the chief executive officer of Diebold Election Systems, a major provider of election equipment, had pledged in a Republican fund-raising letter last year that he was ''committed" to delivering Ohio's electoral votes to President Bush.
Spokesmen for the companies and many election officials said there are enough checks and balances in the current system.
Published by
Associated Press
What do you think?
This material is copyrighted by its original publisher.
It is reprinted by Unknown News without permission, solely for purposes of criticism, comment, and news reporting, in accordance with the Fair Use Guidelines of copyright material under § 107 of U.S.C. Title 17.
|
There's much more than this at Unknown News.
|
From the archives, April 30, 2004:
California Secretary Of State
bans electronic voting
From the archives, April 28, 2004:
Two companies & two brothers will count 80% of U.S. ballots
From the archives, April 23, 2004:
Diebold may face criminal charges
From the archives, April 22, 2004:
Diebold apologizes for
disenfranchising California voters
From the archives, March 14, 2004:
Designer of verified vote system
dies in unlucky accident
From the archives, March 4, 2004:
A deafening silence as democracy expires
From the archives, Feb. 24, 2004:
Diebold, electronic voting and
the vast right-wing conspiracy
From the archives, Feb. 15, 2004:
Would you like a receipt with that election?
Technologists advocate a paper trail
for electronic voting machines
From the archives, Feb. 6, 2004:
Michigan plans internet vote
despite hacking risks
From the archives, Feb. 6, 2004:
Company lied about voting machine's reliability
From the archives, Jan. 30, 2004:
This week in vote fraud
From the archives, Jan. 20, 2004:
Company with worst e-voting security record produces machines with wireless capability
From the archives, Jan. 17, 2004:
This week in U.S. election fraud
From the archives, Dec. 17:
Yeah, let's put Diebold in charge of elections
From the archives, Dec. 14, 2003:
Vote system provides receipt, verification that your vote was counted
From the archives, Dec. 2:
Diebold backs off legal intimidation
From the archives, Nov. 10:
More election machine problems
From the archives, Nov. 6:
Electronic voting machines cause problems nationwide
From the archives, Nov. 4:
Diebold sued over cease-and-desist tactics
From the archives, Nov. 3:
New York Times briefly awakens from long nap, notes controversy, goes back to sleep
From the archives, Nov. 3:
When votes don't count
by Madeline Zane, Unknown News
From the archives, Oct. 24:
Diebold memos disclose
Florida 2000 e-voting fraudBackground information :
Election 2000: Our final tally
|
|
|
