by Ted Bridis, Associated Press
|
July 6, 2004
WASHINGTON (AP) -- A federal judge threw out a lawsuit Tuesday by a whistle-blower who alleged security lapses in the FBI's translator program, ruling that her claims might expose government secrets that could damage national security.
U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton said he was satisfied with claims by Attorney General John Ashcroft and a senior FBI official that the civil lawsuit by Sibel Edmonds could expose intelligence-gathering methods and disrupt diplomatic relations with foreign governments.
The judge said he couldn't explain further because his explanation itself would expose sensitive secrets.
Edmonds, a former contract linguist for the FBI, said she will appeal the ruling.
She alleged in her lawsuit that she was fired in March 2002 after she complained to FBI managers about shoddy wiretap translations and told them an interpreter with a relative at a foreign embassy might have compromised national security.
|
U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton said he was satisfied with claims by Attorney General John Ashcroft and a senior FBI official that the civil lawsuit by Sibel Edmonds could expose intelligence-gathering methods and disrupt diplomatic relations with foreign governments.
The judge said he couldn't explain further because his explanation itself would expose sensitive secrets.
|
|
|
|
Edmonds said the judge dismissed her lawsuit without hearing evidence from her lawyers, although the government's lawyers met with Walton at least twice privately. She noted that Walton, the judge, was appointed by President Bush.
"This shows how the separation of power has basically disappeared," Edmonds said in a telephone interview. "The judge ruled on this case without actually this ever being a case."
In his decision, Walton acknowledged that dismissing a lawsuit before the facts of the case can be heard is "Draconian" and said he was throwing out the lawsuit "with great consternation."
"Mindful of the need for virtual unfettered access to the judicial process in a governmental system integrally linked to the rule of law, the court nonetheless concludes that the government has properly invoked the state secrets privilege," Walton ruled.
Edmonds' lawyer, Mark S. Zaid, called the decision "another example of the executive branch's abuse of secrecy to prevent accountability."
"The judiciary seems to be unwilling to do anything but capitulate to assertions of national security," Zaid said.
The Justice Department's inspector general is investigating whether the FBI retaliated against Edmonds, who was subjected to a security review after she raised allegations of security lapses. The bureau said problems with Edmonds' performance were behind the dismissal.
The FBI translator program has played a significant role in interpreting interviews and intercepts of Osama bin Laden's network since Sept. 11.
Published by
Associated Press
|
What do you think?
This material is copyrighted by its original publisher.
It is reprinted by Unknown News without permission, solely for purposes of criticism, comment, and news reporting, in accordance with the Fair Use Guidelines of copyright material under § 107 of U.S.C. Title 17.
There's much more than this at Unknown News.
|
From the archives, May 20, 2004:
Whoops, you weren't supposed
to know that about Sept. 11
9/11 testimony from 2002 suddenly classified
# with comments by Barbara and H&HH
From the archives, May 19, 2004:
9/11 Commission inquiry
is full of unspoken questions
From the archives, May 15, 2004:
9/11 panelists bewildered by what Bush administration calls “classified information”
From the archives, May 6, 2004:
FAA manager destroyed 9/11 tapes
From the archives, May 2, 2004:
9/11 Commission's Presidential disaster
by Heath Honesty and H&HH, Unknown News
From the archives, April 29, 2004:
Sept. 11 widow says
"I'm 100% sure that they knew"
From the archives, April 29, 2004:
BushCheney non-testify
before 9/11 Commission
# with comments by Luke and Kathy Fisher
From the archives, April 26, 2004:
Government tries to gag FBI worker over 9/11
From the archives, April 26, 2004:
Two questions for the 9/11 Commission
by Susan Strouss, Unknown News
From the archives, April 19, 2004:
September 11, 2001:
Questions that'll never be asked ...
by Tess Ellis, Unknown News
From the archives, April 14, 2004:
FBI whistleblowers go unheard
9-11 Commission disregards
survivor families' interests
From the archives, April 13, 2004:
Ashcroft's record of
lying to Congress about 9/11
From the archives, April 9, 2004:
Why won't the U.S. cooperate
with Sept. 11 prosecutions?
# with comments by H&HH
From the archives, April 9, 2004:
The pre-9/11 blunder
you’ve probably never heard of
From the archives, April 2, 2004:
FBI whistleblower says Rice is lying:
Bush knew al-Qaida was planning attack
From the archives, March 28, 2004:
Conflict of interest at heart of the 9/11 'investigation'
From the archives,
March 25-26, 2004:
Rice contradicts CIA,
Cheney, Armitage, herself
From the archives, March 22, 2004:
After 2 ½ years asleep,
Wall Street Journal notices
a few oddities about Sept. 11
# with comments by H&HH
From the archives, March 14, 2004:
High-ranking government
officials took Sept. 11 souvenirs
# with comments by John C. and H&HH
From the archives, March 4, 2004:
U.S. stonewalling may let
another terror suspect off the hook
German prosecutor calls
U.S. conduct "incomprehensible"
# with comments by John C. and H&HH
From the archives, Feb. 10, 2004:
Daschle still says Bush & Cheney
asked for no 9/11 investigation at all
|
|
|
