Welcome to UNKNOWN NEWS
"News that's not known, or not known enough."
Helen & Harry Highwater's cranky weblog of news and opinion.
Home  |  About us  |  Contact us  |  Daily headlines  |  Dialogue  |  Guidelines  |  Index  |  Mystery links  |  Stickers & stuff  |
Election fraud: Quietly undermining democracy in America


Click or scroll down for earlier items:
Election 2000: Our final tally  April 2002  Nov. 2002  Jan. 2003  July 2003  Aug. 2003  Sept. 2003  Oct. 2003  Nov. 2003  Dec. 2003  Jan. 2004  Feb. 2004  March 2004  April 2004  May 2004  June 2004  July 2004  Aug. 2004  Sept. 2004  Oct. 2004  Nov. 2004  Dec. 2004  Jan. 2005  Feb. 2005  March 2005  April 2005  May 2005  July 2005  Aug. 2005  Oct. 2005  Nov. 2005  Dec. 2005  Jan. 2006  Feb. 2006  March 2006  April 2006  May 2006  June 2006  July 2006  Aug. 2006  Sept. 2006  Oct. 2006  Nov. 2006  Jan. 2007  March 2007  April 2007  May 2007  June 2007  July 2007  Aug. 2007  Sept. 2007  Jan. 2008  Electronic voting machines vs Las Vegas slots    BlackBoxVoting.org     BradBlog (good coverage of the issue)     Jim's Diebold Page     ExitPollz.org  

Jan. 27, 2008
Diebold voting machine key copied from picture on Diebold site
 
Excerpt: In another stunning blow to the security and integrity of Diebold's electronic voting machines, someone has made a copy of the key which opens ALL Diebold e-voting machines from a picture on the company's own website. The working keys were confirmed by Princeton scientists, the same people who discovered that a simple virus hack on the Diebold machines could steal an election. Absolutely incredible and another example of how Diebold's e-voting machines pose a great threat to the electoral process.

Sept. 28, 2007:
Judge voids election because of e-voting snafus
 
Excerpt: Good news from California's Alameda County -- a judge has voided election results after the county botched its response to a contested race conducted on Diebold electronic voting machines. The judge ordered that the disputed Measure R -- an initiative addressing the operation of medical marijuana dispensaries -- go back on next year's ballot.

Sept. 28, 2007:
Republicans' steal-the-election initiative collapses in California
 
Excerpt: Days after a controversial organization began collecting voter signatures for a ballot measure to change California's winner-take-all presidential vote, a founder of the GOP-backed group says its major players are resigning - and the group will fold - due to lack of funding and support.

"The levels of support just weren't there," said Marty Wilson, the Sacramento-based fundraiser, in a telephone interview Thursday.

Sept. 26, 2007:
High Court to hear voter ID arguments
 
Excerpt: A voter seeking to cast a ballot is first told to produce a photo ID. Is that intimidation or a prudent safeguard against election fraud? The Supreme Court said Tuesday it intends to decide, stepping into a controversy that blends race, partisan politics and the Constitution.

Comment: Isn't this the same Supreme Court that was asked by the Republicans to throw the election for Bush, and said 'sure'?   Marshall S.     PERMANENT LINK 

Sept. 26, 2007:
Ohio, Florida laws could dampen Democratic voting
 
Excerpt: Ohio and Florida, which provided the decisive electoral votes for President Bush's two razor-thin national election triumphs, have enacted laws that election experts say will help Republicans impede Democratic-leaning minorities from voting in 2008.

Backers of the new laws say they're aimed at curbing vote fraud. But the statutes also could facilitate a controversial Republican tactic known as ``vote caging,'' which the GOP attempted in Ohio and Florida in 2004 before public disclosures foiled the efforts, said Joseph Rich, a former Justice Department voting rights chief in the Bush administration who's now with the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights.

Comment: A "controversial" tactic? I'm no lawyer, but my admittedly un-informed impression is that vote caging is simply illegal under federal law.   Helen & Harry     PERMANENT LINK 

Sept. 25, 2007:
Federal Elections Commission nominee doesn't want to let Democrats vote
 
Excerpt: Another one for you to file under "fox guards the henhouse": The Senate rules committee votes tomorrow (Wednesday) on whether to give Hans A. von Spakovsky a full six-year term on the Federal Elections Commission. For Senate Democrats to even consider allowing someone with von Spakovsky's background to sit on the independent agency tasked with protecting the integrity of federal elections is beyond incredible. If von Spakovsky is confirmed, it will be yet more evidence that Democrats have no more regard for the rule of law, or the integrity of the Justice Department, than Karl Rove does.

Sept. 18, 2007:
California Secretary of State says voting machine 'sleepovers' violate state law
 
Excerpt: She's hinted as much previously, and her new security requirements issued in the wake of her landmark "Top-to-Bottom Review" of e-voting systems would seem to preclude them, but CA Secretary of State, Debra Bowen has now given her most direct comment to date on the matter of voting machine "sleepovers".

"Sleepovers don't comply with the security requirements," Bowen said in response to a question we submitted on the matter during a conference call with the Secretary sponsored by the Courage Campaign.

"It's really simple," she added, after a pause following her immediate, direct reply to the question.

Sept. 11, 2007:
Why doesn't the Republican Party want Ohio's voting machines tested?
 
Excerpt: Ohio Republicans have blocked a proposal to test electronic voting machines prior to the 2008 presidential primary.

By a 4-3 vote, Republicans on Ohio's State Controlling Board blocked Democratic Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner's proposed $1.8 million unbid contract for voting machine testing. Brunner had already set aside the $1.8 million for the test. Her specific request to the Controlling Board was a waiver for competitive bidding. Her office had hoped to complete all testing by November 30, 2007.

August 29, 2007:
"Election Crimes" report is rigged and rotten says co-author
 
Excerpt: We spent a year doing research and consulting with leaders in the field to produce a draft report. What happened next seems inexplicable. After submitting the draft in July 2006, we were barred by the commission's staff from having anything more to do with it.

What was the problem? In all the time we were doing our research and drafting the report, neither the staff nor the commissioners, who were continually advised of our activities and the substance of our work, raised any concerns about the direction we were going or the research findings.

Yet, after sitting on the draft for six months, the EAC publicly released a report -- citing it as based on work by me and my co-author -- that completely stood our own work on its head.

August 16, 2007:
Diebold, maker of vote-stealing machines, changes corporate name
 
Excerpt: The company said that after failing to find a buyer for its voting machine business, it was changing the name of the division to Premier Election Solutions Inc (or PESI) and was giving it more "independence" by establishing a separate board of directors to run it.

August 15, 2007:
Sequoia Voting Systems responsible for 2000 Presidential debacle?
 
Excerpt: It's been seven years since pregnant and dangling chads in Florida caused one of the biggest political rifts in U.S. history. Those faulty Florida ballots also directly led to the passage of federal legislation in 2002 that outlawed punch-card voting machines and allocated billions of dollars in federal funds for states to purchase expensive new electronic voting machines.

Now new questions are being raised about who was responsible for the faulty punch cards in that election. And according to last night's Dan Rather Reports episode, the fingers point to Sequoia Voting Systems, which not only makes e-voting machines that replaced punch cards but also created the punch cards that failed in Florida.

August 12, 2007:
Ohio election officials violated court order,
destroyed 1.6-million 2004 ballots
 
Excerpt: Despite a federal judge's order to preserve all ballots from the 2004 presidential election - in which Ohio provided President Bush's margin of victory -- boards of elections in 56 of Ohio's 88 counties lost, shredded or dumped nearly 1.6 million ballots and election records.

In 39 letters of explanation sent to newly elected Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner, a Democrat, county election officials offered a litany of excuses for the missing and destroyed ballots -- including spilled coffee, a flooded storage areaand miscommunication with a county "Green Team" assigned to pick up recyclables. About half the lost ballots were unused, but even those are important for double-checking election results.

More evidence of vote-tampering in 2004 Ohio vote

Excerpt: The groups behind the lawsuit say they have uncovered evidence of possible tampering in Clermont County, a traditionally Republican-leaning county where Bush won easily.

For example: oval-shaped stickers were inexplicably found on at least 10 ballots in Clermont County, for several several state and local races as well as president and the same-sex marriage ballot issue.

The tiny white stickers would have blocked an optical scanner from counting a vote for the pencil mark that’s visible below. Two of those ballots from Pierce Township were preserved and observed by Enquirer reporters Thursday.

July 30, 2007:
Ohio voting records from 2004 illegally destroyed
 
Excerpt: In 56 of Ohio's 88 counties, ballots and election records from 2004 have been "accidentally" destroyed, despite a federal order to preserve them -- it was crucial evidence which would have revealed whether the election was stolen.

July 28, 2007:
Scientists hack voting machines to show security weaknesses
 
Excerpt: Computer scientists from California universities have hacked into three electronic voting systems used in California and elsewhere in the nation and found several ways in which vote totals could potentially be altered, according to reports released yesterday by the state.

June 19, 2007:
Federal Election Commissioner accused of accused of blocking lawsuits over suppressed minority votes
 
Excerpt: A former Justice Department political appointee blocked career lawyers from filing at least three lawsuits charging local and county governments with violating the voting rights of African-Americans and other minorities, seven former senior department employees charged Monday.

Hans von Spakovsky also derailed at least two investigations into possible voter discrimination, the former employees of the Voting Rights Section said in interviews and in a letter to the Senate Rules and Administration Committee. They urged the panel to reject von Spakovsky's nomination to the Federal Election Commission.

June 19, 2007:
Two Senators seek info on Republican vote caging
 
Excerpt: Senators Kennedy and Whitehouse have sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales demanding a probe by the DoJ's Office of the Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility into "allegations that the Republican National Committee engaged in 'vote caging' during the 2004 elections."

The letter, sent today to Gonzales, also requests an investigation into "whether any Department officials were aware of allegations that Tim Griffin had engaged in caging when he was appointed United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, and whether appropriate action was taken."

June 18, 2007:
Candidate who 'lost' Florida election on hinky machines is not allowed to see how (or whether) votes were counted
 
Excerpt: A state appellate court ruled Monday that Christine Jennings has no right to examine the programming source code that runs the electronic voting machines she says malfunctioned in her southwest Florida congressional race.

The three-judge panel said Monday Jennings did not meet the "extraordinary burden" of proving a lower court was wrong to deny her request last December.

May 31, 2007:
U.S. attorney targeted for firing for
standing up for minority voting rights
 
Excerpt: By the time Heffelfinger resigned last year, his office had collected a string of awards and commendations from the Justice Department. So it came as a surprise - and something of a mystery - when he turned up on a list of U.S. attorneys who had been targeted for firing. Part of the reason, government documents and other evidence suggest, is that he tried to protect voting rights for Native Americans.

Citing requirements in a new state election law, Republican Secretary of State Mary Kiffmeyer directed that tribal ID cards could not be used for voter identification by Native Americans living off reservations. Heffelfinger and his staff feared that the ruling could result in discrimination against Indian voters. Many do not have driver's licenses or forms of identification other than the tribes' photo IDs.

Comment: Beyond being a scandal about replacing decent attorneys with ultra-partisan hacks, it seems more and more that the underlying plan in replacing specific U.S. attorneys was largely geared towards enabling pro-Republican election fraud.

David Iglesias in New Mexico, Todd Graves in Missouri, and now Tom Heffelfinger in Minnesota were all pushed out for refusing to go along with Republican attempts to disenfranchise Democratic voters. And the replacement U.S. Attorneys in both Missouri (Bradley Schlozman) and Arkansas (Tim Griffin) are now accused of participating in efforts to suppress likely-Democratic votes.
Madeline Zane  PERMANENT LINK

May 18, 2007:
Republicans close phony group dedicated to phony "vote fraud" problem
 
Excerpt: ... the group was founded just days before its representatives testified before a congressional committee hearing on election-administration issues chaired by then-Rep. (and now federal inmate) Bob Ney. The group was headed by Hearne, national election counsel to Bush-Cheney '04, and staffed with other Republican operatives, including Jim Dyke, a former RNC communications director.

April 19, 2007:
Ohio audit says Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) vote database may have been corrupted
 
Excerpt: Problems found in an audit of Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) tabulation records from an Ohio November 2006 election raise questions about whether the database got corrupted during the tabulation of election results, says a report released today.

The document, from a team of researchers tasked with auditing the November election in troubled Cuyahoga County, have called for a thorough examination of the database to determine if corruption did occur and the extent to which it may have affected the election results.

April 19, 2007:
Bush-Cheney administration tried to curb election turnout in key states
 
Excerpt: For six years, the Bush administration, aided by Justice Department political appointees, has pursued an aggressive legal effort to restrict voter turnout in key battleground states in ways that favor Republican political candidates, according to former department lawyers and a review of written records.

Comment: There's virtually nothing in this article that's news, to people who've been following the Bush-Cheney administration's profoundly anti-democracy policies on so many fronts.

It's also not news that this reprehensible attempt to suppress voter turnout has, by and large, been successful.

What's news here, is only that it's made the news.
Helen & Harry  PERMANENT LINK

April 16, 2007:
Tests on Florida's rigged voting machines were "essentially useless"
 
Excerpt: The testers examining the machines defined acccuracy as a machine making a correct electronic copy of the review screen. Dill and Wallach say this ignores whether the review screen itself is correct. If a voter touched the machine to vote for a candidate and the vote showed up on the ballot page but not on the review screen, the machine would still be considered accurate, according to the Florida testers, if it copied the error on the review screen.

The testers didn't test for latency issues with the screens. Numerous voters complained they had to touch the screens repeatedly or with extra pressure to get it to register their selection. The tests weren't designed to look for that, however. Dill and Wallach say that on videos of the state testing there were several instances when a tester had to touch the screen more than once to get it to register. That's not, however, reflected in the state's report.

The state didn't test for calibration errors, although there were voters who complained about selecting one candidate and having a vote for another candidate appear.

The testers examining the source code did not verify that the compiled binary executable code used on the machines during the election was consistent with the source code they examined.

March 23, 2007:
Iglesias was ordered to prosecute group for registering low-income Latino voters
 
Excerpt: Behind all the furor around U.S. Attorney David Iglesias, one of eight federal prosecutors who were fired by the Bush administration, was an effort by the Republican Party to suppress massive voter registration in New Mexico during the 2004 election. According to reporter Michael Coleman of the Albuquerque Journal Washington Bureau, Mickey Barnett, a former Albuquerque Republican national committeeman, sent an e-mail message to Iglesias in September 2004 chastising him for “appointing a task force to investigate voter fraud instead of bringing charges against suspects.” During the 2004 election campaign, New Mexico ACORN engaged in a huge voter registration drive in which individuals were paid to bring in valid voter registrations. It only took one informant to come forth and “confess” to obtaining registrations fraudulently for the whole New Mexican Republican machinery, along with its daily mouthpiece the Albuquerque Journal, to proclaim that this mass voter registration was illegal.

Jan. 15, 2007:
Wrong winner chosen twice by same voting machine
 
Excerpt: The Election Contest filed by Democrat Christine Jennings and her attorney Kendall Coffey creates complications that could blow the electronic voting world to pieces. In the simplest terms, the Jennings Florida 13th Congressional district case requires a review of the Kissell loss in North Carolina’s 8th Congressional district. And that spells disaster for e-voting.

Why? Because both the Florida and North Carolina districts used iVotronics touch screen voting machines. These voting machines produced very similar levels of counting errors. The errors cost both Democrats thousands of votes. Ultimately, both Democratic candidates were denied a victory by less than 400 votes.

Jan. 6, 2007:
Report outlines midterm e-voting failures
 
Excerpt: A report on the November midterms released this past week by three different e-voting activist groups describes problems with electronic voting machines in 36 states. The report (PDF), entitled "E-Voting Failures in the 2006 Mid-Term Elections: A Sampling of Problems Across the Nation," is based on reports made to a non-partisan hotline that operated the day of the November 7 midterm elections. Calls to the hotline yielded 1022 separate incident reports, the vast majority of which concerned problems with direct-recording electronic (DRE) machines like the Diebold Accuvote (now Premier Election Solutions) model described in my article on how to steal an election. Problems were also reported with scanners and electronic ballot markers, but DREs made up the bulk of the complaints.

Nov. 22, 2006:
Stolen election in Florida:
Uncounted votes were overwhelmingly Democratic, handed Congressional election to Republican
 
Excerpt: The group of nearly 18,000 voters that registered no choice in Sarasota's disputed congressional election solidly backed Democratic candidates in all five of Florida's statewide races, an Orlando Sentinel analysis of ballot data shows.

Comment: Jennings' Republican opponent, Vern Buchanan, is eager to accept an victory that he can't possibly not know was fraudulent. But as Republicans demand that Jennings concede the election, making a ruckus about it is probably more important than any vote Jennings would cast in Congress.

So please, Congressperson-Elect Jennings, keep standing firm, and don't ever pretend that the election wasn't stolen. Don't concede today, tomorrow, or ever.   Helen & Harry   PERMANENT LINK

Oct. 3, 2006:
The importance of not getting over it
by Joel Bleifuss, In These Times
 
Excerpt: On Election Day 2004, 64 percent of Americans voted on direct recorded electronic voting machines or optical-scan systems, both of which are vulnerable to hacking or programming fraud. And with these new technologies, it would only take a few people to steal an election.

Sept. 28, 2006:
U.S. soldiers' overseas votes ripe for fraud
 
• Soldiers are not warned about risks to their personal information and voting choices when they e-mail or fax their ballots;

• Soldiers who fax or e-mail ballots will be required to waive their right to a secret ballot;

• Soldiers are not informed that ballots they e-mail directly to the Department of Defense will be processed by an outside contractor, whose executives have made contributions to Republican organizations

Sept. 22, 2006:
Will the next election be hacked?
by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Rolling Stone
 
Excerpt: Electronic voting machines also caused widespread problems in Florida, where Bush bested Kerry by 381,000 votes. When statistical experts from the University of California examined the state's official tally, they discovered a disturbing pattern: "The data show with 99.0 percent certainty that a county's use of electronic voting is associated with a disproportionate increase in votes for President Bush. Compared to counties with paper ballots, counties with electronic voting machines were significantly more likely to show increases in support for President Bush between 2000 and 2004." The three counties with the most discrepancies -- Broward, Palm Beach and Miami-Dade -- were also the most heavily Democratic. Electronic voting machines, the report concluded, may have improperly awarded as many as 260,000 votes to Bush. "No matter how many factors and variables we took into consideration, the significant correlation in the votes for President Bush and electronic voting cannot be explained," said Michael Hout, a member of the National Academy of Sciences.

Charles Stewart III, an MIT professor who specializes in voter behavior and methodology, was initially skeptical of the study -- but was unable to find any flaw in the results. "You can't break it -- I've tried," he told The Washington Post. "There's something funky in the results from the electronic-machine Democratic counties."

Sept. 18, 2006:
“Hotel minibar” keys open Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) voting machines
 
Excerpt: A little research revealed that the exact same key is used widely in office furniture, electronic equipment, jukeboxes, and hotel minibars. It’s a standard part, and like most standard parts it’s easily purchased on the Internet. We bought several keys from an office furniture key shop -- they open the voting machine too. We ordered another key on eBay from a jukebox supply shop. The keys can be purchased from many online merchants.

Sept. 13, 2006:
Princeton researchers show how to steal an election with Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) machines
 
Excerpt: Princeton security researchers Ariel J. Feldman, J. Alex Halderman, and Edward W. Felten have taken apart one of Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions)'s notorious voting machines and done a thorough security analysis of its workings. They showed that they could easily install software on the machine that would allow an attacker to steal votes from one candidate and give them to another -- they showed that this would be undetectable, and easily done. They've published a paper and an amazing, disturbing video showing how this could be done.

Aug. 30, 2006:
Elections can't be challenged, judge rules
 
Excerpt: Judge Yuri Hofmann noted that the House unanimously voted to swear Brian Bilbray in on June 13, and with that act “this court no longer has jurisdiction.”

In his ruling, the judge cited Article I of the U.S. Constitution, which says, in part, that the House and Senate “shall be the judge of the elections, returns and qualifications of its members.”

Comment: The election results had not been certified when Brian Bilbray flew to Washington DC and was sworn into Congress, on June 13. The election was close and smells funny, and it's still being challenged by a few die-hard fans of democracy, but apparently the vote count is irrelevant -- because Bilbray was sworn in.

He was sworn in weeks before the election was certified, but his position in Congress cannot be questioned by a judge, or at least, that's this judge's ruling. The state's voters have no legal standing to challenge this -- because Bilbray was sworn in.

The Republicans have discovered yet another tactic to circumvent elections. Under the logic of this ruling, Republicans who control Congress can swear in Republicans who 'win' an election before a recount is conducted, or before a recount is even possible. They can simply swear in their preferred candidate, and all challenges and recounts become moot.

Following this concept to its logical conclusion, is there any reason why the Republican Congress couldn't swear in the Republican candidate, even if an opposing candidate clearly has more votes? Why bother conducting elections for Congressional seats, if the party in power can swear in anyone they choose, and their decision cannot be challenged?   Helen & Harry   PERMANENT LINK

Aug. 29, 2006:
Court rules against full recount in Mexican Presidential election
 
Comment: Mexico's election officials sort of recounted some of the votes in the recent presidential elections. But then a court ignored those results and extreme oddities elsewhere, refused to count any more, and decided that the right-wing candidate beloved by the Bush administration and pretending to have the most votes is the new president.

With only a few days until the recount deadline, it seems that the only question now is how Antonin Scalia, Karl Rove, and Katherine Harris split up the royalty payments.

But if corrupt Mexican election officials stole a page from Bush's playbook, Democrats on this side of the border could learn something from the behavior of those the election was stolen from: The candidate who should have won said so often, publicly, and loudly. He inspired hundreds of thousands of citizens to protest in the streets. This week, even after the court decided against them, the opposition party's legislators stopped outgoing president Vicente Fox from giving his annual state-of-the-nation speech for the first time in Mexico's history.

Even if this doesn't change the official outcome of the election, it seems likely that people who bring up the illegitimacy of their leader in the next few years won't be treated as a bunch of kooks, and that the new "president" will have to take the opposition party more seriously knowing that they will actually, you know, oppose him.   Madeline Zane   PERMANENT LINK

Aug. 29, 2006:
Republican scheme to block vote registration struck down by court
 
Comment: The law, passed by Florida's Republican-dominated legislature and signed by its Republican governor, imposed such enormous fines that even misplacing a few registrations could bankrupt the League of Women Voters or other groups trying to register new voters.

It was one of many bald-faced attempts by Republicans to make sure more people don't vote -- because the enemies of democracy aren't wearing turbans and speaking Arabic. They're in the White House and the Republican Party.   Helen & Harry Highwater   PERMANENT LINK

Aug. 23, 2006:
Computer programmer testifies: 'I wrote vote-switching software for Republican'
 
Question: Are there computer programs that can be used to secretly fix elections?

Stephen Pizzo: Yes.

Question: How do you know that to be the case?

Stephen Pizzo: Because in October of 2000, I wrote a prototype for Congressman Tom Feeney [R-FL]...

Aug. 16, 2006:
Has Bush v. Gore become the case that must not be named?
by Adam Cohen, New York Times
 
Excerpt: At a law school Supreme Court conference that I attended last fall, there was a panel on "The Rehnquist Court." No one mentioned Bush v. Gore, the most historic case of William Rehnquist's time as chief justice, and during the Q. and A. no one asked about it. When I asked a prominent law professor about this strange omission, he told me he had been invited to participate in another Rehnquist retrospective, and was told in advance that Bush v. Gore would not be discussed.

The ruling that stopped the Florida recount and handed the presidency to George W. Bush is disappearing down the legal world's version of the memory hole, the slot where, in George Orwell's "1984," government workers disposed of politically inconvenient records. The Supreme Court has not cited it once since it was decided, and when Justice Antonin Scalia, who loves to hold forth on court precedents, was asked about it at a forum earlier this year, he snapped, "Come on, get over it."

Aug. 11, 2006:
Election stolen, says Mexican Presidential candidate -- who refuses to fade away
 
Excerpt: Mexico's opposition leader said on Friday a partial recount of votes from the presidential election he narrowly lost has shown so many errors that the top electoral court will have to declare him president-elect.

Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, the leftist who claims he was robbed in the July 2 election, said the recount of 9 percent of ballot boxes was only half complete but inconsistencies from the original tallies already topped 100,000 votes.

July 31, 2006:
Voters' lawsuit asks court to order recount of California Congress election
 
Excerpt: The county allowed both electronic touch-screen machines and the optical-scan machines that read paper ballots to be stored in "unsecured locations, such as poll workers' car trunks and residential garages."

July 23, 2006:
Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) voting machines even more vulnerable to hacking than previously known
 
Excerpt: Recently, computer security expert Harri Hursti revealed serious security vulnerabilities in Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions)'s software. According to Michael Shamos, a computer scientist and voting system examiner in Pennsylvania, "It's the most severe security flaw ever discovered in a voting system."

Even more shockingly, we learned recently that Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) and the State of Maryland had been aware of these vulnerabilities for at least two years. They were documented in analysis, commissioned by Maryland and conducted by RABA Technologies, published in January 2004. For over two years, Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) has chosen not to fix the security holes, and Maryland has chosen not to alert other states or national officials about these problems.

Basically, Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) included a "back door" in its software, allowing anyone to change or modify the software. There are no technical safeguards in place to ensure that only authorized people can make changes.

A malicious individual with access to a voting machine could rig the software without being detected. Worse yet, if the attacker rigged the machine used to compute the totals for some precinct, he or she could alter the results of that precinct. The only fix the RABA authors suggested was to warn people that manipulating an election is against the law.

July 8, 2006:
Hundreds of thousands protest unbelievable
outcome of Mexico's presidential election
 
Comment: A stolen election -- but unlike when elections are stolen in America, in Mexico the people give a damn and shout their protests. Unlike in America, the candidate from whom the election was stolen is willing to make a ruckus. Unlike in America, a stolen election makes the news.

This is just plain unAmerican.   Rebecca ;(in Mexico)   PERMANENT LINK

June 26, 2006:
Most voting machines vulnerable to hacking, study concludes
 
Comment: And yet they're buying these machines, conducting elections with these machines.

It's enough to make you wonder ... or at least, it's enough to make you wonder if you know about it.

But it rarely makes the news, and even this article won't mention the breathtakingly long list of improprieties involving voting machines in the 2004 election, and the 2002 election, and the 2000 election, and the 1998 election.   Helen & Harry   PERMANENT LINK

June 23, 2006:
Republicans again seeking to suppress black vote
 
Excerpt: In the 2004 presidential race, the GOP ran a massive, multi-state, multimillion-dollar operation to challenge the legitimacy of black, Hispanic and Native American voters. The methods used breached the Voting Rights Act, and while the Bush administration's civil rights division grinned and looked the other way, civil rights lawyers began circling, preparing to sue to stop the violations of the act before the 2008 race.

So Republicans have promised to no longer break the law -- not by going legit but by eliminating the law.

June, 2006:
Robert Kennedy: 2004 election was stolen
 
Excerpt: But despite the media blackout, indications continued to emerge that something deeply troubling had taken place in 2004. Nearly half of the 6 million American voters living abroad never received their ballots -- or received them too late to vote -- after the Pentagon unaccountably shut down a state-of-the-art Web site used to file overseas registrations. A consulting firm called Sproul & Associates, which was hired by the Republican National Committee to register voters in six battleground states, was discovered shredding Democratic registrations. In New Mexico, which was decided by 5,988 votes, malfunctioning machines mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential vote on more than 20,000 ballots. Nationwide, according to the federal commission charged with implementing election reforms, as many as 1 million ballots were spoiled by faulty voting equipment -- roughly one for every 100 cast...

Comment: Even if you've heard the hubbub about this article and are pretty well convinced that the Republicans stole 2004, I strongly recommend reading this. And anyone who isn't convinced that 2004 was stolen will be by the end of the first page. It's not just important as the kerfuffle of the day ... as you can see in the clip above, all the facts are laid out and sourced very clearly.   Helen & Harry   PERMANENT LINK

June 7, 2006:
Republican "wins" in hinky-as-hell San Diego Congressional election
 
Excerpt: The biggest concern about the race, by far, is that San Diego County uses two types of Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) voting systems -- optical-scan and touch-screen -- both of which have not only proven to be disastrously unreliable in San Diego County and California in the past, but have also been demonstrated over the last six months to feature dozens of exceedingly well-documented and remarkable security vulnerabilities, making them extremely accessible to tampering. Especially if anyone has unsupervised physical access for more than a minute or two with them.

The voting machines used in Tuesday's election were sent home with volunteer poll workers the night before the election, according to the San Diego County Registrar of Voters office today. As well, The Brad Blog has received reports that in some cases, poll workers may have had the machines alone at their houses, unsupervised, for a week or even two prior to Tuesday's election....

May 30, 2006:
Republicans win elections by suppressing the vote
 
Excerpt: Florida recently reached a new low when it actually bullied the League of Women Voters into stopping its voter registration efforts in the state. The Legislature did this by adopting a law that seems intended to scare away anyone who wants to run a voter registration drive. Since registration drives are particularly important for bringing poor people, minority groups and less educated voters into the process, the law appears to be designed to keep such people from voting.

May 11, 2006:
Scientists call Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) security flaw 'worst ever'
 
Excerpt: "I think it's the most serious thing I've heard to date," said Johns Hopkins University computer science professor Avi Rubin, who published the first security analysis of Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) voting software in 2003. "Even describing why I think it's serious is dangerous. This is something that's so easy to do that if the public were to hear about it, it would raise the risk of someone doing it. ... This is the worst-case scenario, almost."

May 11, 2006:
Poll: 2004 election was stolen; according to viewers of all news networks except Fox News
 
Excerpt: In the first poll of its kind, (using First choice of TV news network as a demographic variable) OpEdNews.com, in the second OpEdNews/Zogby People's poll has learned that except for viewers of right wing news show, Fox News, poll respondents believe that the 2004 presidential election was stolen.

May 9, 2006:
Ohio election fraud investigated ... by the man who caused it
 
Comment: This makes perfect sense. In a universe where it's not a conflict of interest for Kenneth Blackwell to simultaneously run Ohio's elections and chair Bush's election committee, and it's not a conflict of interest to buy stock in a company and then award that company a contract to supply unreliable voting machines, the words "conflict of interest" have been reduced to a series of nonsense syllables.

In such a universe, getting an independent entity with no ties to the crooked elections to investigate the crooked elections would be a waste of time and money.   Madeline Zane   LINK

April 9, 2006:
E-Voting 2006: The approaching train wreck

April 6, 2006:
Election officials indicted for phony Ohio re-count

April 4, 2006:
Good riddance, Tom DeLay:
Texas tyrant hated democracy, and fought to end it

by John Nichols, The Capital Times [Madison, WI]
 
Excerpt: DeLay's role in the 2000 recount, though little reported and even now little understood outside the inner circles of the Republican and Democratic parties, was definitional.

March 18, 2006:
Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) voting machines pose electrocution hazard
 
Excerpt: This happened on every TSx we tested, and presents a significant safety hazard for poll workers, especially the elderly. According to Hursti, the electrocution might only result in a burned hand, and probably wouldn't be fatal.

Comment: This will be corrected in future models. Only if you try to vote for the wrong candidate will you be shocked.   SirJ   LINK

March 16, 2006:
How to steal an election
Las Vegas slots vs. voting machines


March 8, 2006:
Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions), competitors, refuse to sell required voting machines to whistleblower's county

Feb. 23, 2006:
Florida voting machine logs show thousands of oddities in 2004 election

Feb. 22 2006:
Why do Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions)'s touch-screen voting machines have built-in wireless infrared data transfer ports?
by Brad, BradBlog
 
Excerpt: This is a remote communication port through which another remote device could communicate with the touch screen and change either its data or its software or both.

Comment: All the better to hack you with, my dear.   Tim M.   LINK

Feb. 9, 2006:
New Jersey Appeals Court reinstates lawsuit over "paper trail" for election machines
Press release, Rutgers School of Law

Jan. 24, 2006:
State won't let Democrats see "squirrelly" 2004 election files
The files are Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions)'s property, not Alaska's


Jan. 19, 2006:
Hacker's five-line program allowed him to change electronic election results, leaving no audit trail

Jan. 17, 2006:
Churches that campaigned for Ohio Republican face IRS complaint

Jan. 17, 2006:
Exit poll data show virtually irrefutable evidence of 2004 vote miscount in Ohio

Jan. 4, 2006:
Wisconsin says electronic voting machines must be open-sourced and paper-trailed
 
Problem solved, for Wisconsin, but not for the rest of the nation ...   =H&HH= | LINK

Dec. 15, 2005:
Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) voting machines hacked in Florida test, machine with paper trail will be used instead

Dec. 15, 2005:
Long-time Republican operative named to head Federal Election Commission during 2006 election

Dec. 12, 2005:
Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) CEO who "delivered" Ohio to Bush resigns; may face insider trading charges

Dec. 3, 2005:
FBI planted fake candidate in West Virginia election

Dec. 2, 2005:
Justice Dept review found Texas redistricting illegal, disenfranchised minorities ... but OK'd by Bush-Cheney political appointees anyway
 
And these are the kind of violations of the Civil Rights Act that Supreme Court nominee Sam Alito would legalize, permanently.   =Madeline Zane= | LINK

Nov. 5, 2005:
Kerry suspects 2004 election was stolen
John Kerry says he kept quiet, allowed Bush to steal the 2004 election, because he feared his objections would be viewed as "sour grapes."

Sorry, no, we won't buy that canard.

If I'm extremely charitable I can almost forgive Al Gore for yielding in the 2000 election, because the notion that a presidential election might be brazenly stolen by the Supreme Court was something of a surprise. By 2004, another stolen election was no surprise at all, yet Kerry was so milquetoast he wouldn't even make a fuss.

He conceded the election, and the democracy, overnight.

Sincerely and with all due respect to John Kerry, the word for that is 'treason'. Same for the Democratic Party.
  =Helen & Harry Highwater= | LINK
Nov. 3, 2005:
New Mexico lawsuit delves inside voting machines

Nov. 2, 2005:
The gun is smoking:
Ohio exit poll data provides virtually irrefutable evidence of vote miscount


Oct. 23, 2005:
When the votes don't add up:
How the religious right hijacked the '04 election


Oct. 21, 2005:
GAO report finds flaws in electronic voting

Oct. 6, 2005:
Did a reporter with GOP ties suppress a story that could have cost Bush the White House?
SALON ASKS NON-SUBSCRIBERS TO VIEW A BRIEF ADVERTISEMENT

Aug. 30, 2005:
Two Ohio election workers indicted in presidential recount

July 28, 2005:
'Justice Dept' clears Ohio of election fraud

July 2, 2005:
Black Box Voting test shows vote can be changed with no trail
Excerpt:  The tests focused on two areas: outside or external hacks, specifically examining the modem and any lines going to the vote tabulation computer, and simulated inside or internal penetrations. The results were clear. No outside hack was accomplished. This was not the case however when the hacker was physically present at the vote tabulation computer terminal.

Granted the same access as an employee of our office, it was possible to enter the computer, alter election results, and exit the system without leaving any physical record of this action. It was also demonstrated that false information or instructions could be placed on a memory card (the device used to program the individual voting machines and record the voter’s votes) and create false results or election reports.
May 19, 2005:
An important victory: Blackwell loses in court

April 1, 2005:
Analysis points to 'corruption' of 2004 vote count

April, 2005:
The 2004 election was stolen -- will someone please tell the media?
If they can disable an election, what's coming next?

Syndicate rejects columnist’s article on 2004 election theft
March 8, 2005:
Blogger digs deep into vote-rigging scandal
# This guy's been spot on about a few things already. He's earned more respect, in my eyes, than the staff at many big-city dailies ...   =H&HH=
Feb. 15 and March 4, 2005:
Despite what you may have heard, the exit polls were right

Feb. 14, 2005:
Ohio's election numbers don't add up

Feb. 1, 2005:
Election fraud: Shut up, they explain

Jan. 26, 2005:
Ohio recount volunteers allege electoral tampering, legal violations and possible fraud

Jan. 24, 2005:
The strange death of American democracy: Endgame in Ohio

Jan. 13, 2005:
Ohio pulls plug on electronic voting

Jan. 11, 2005:
Election farce comes to a predictable end

Jan. 11, 2005:
The last man to concede...
by Sheila Samples, Scoop
Excerpt:  The irregularities were so massive and widespread it took Conyers 102 pages to list them. His report, "Preserving Democracy: What Went Wrong in Ohio," was released on January 5, and is a clear indictment of the shameful lengths to which Republicans will go to derail democracy. At the same time, in a buoyant fund-raising letter to Ohians while the votes were still being counted, Blackwell made the case that he should be elected governor in return for saving the Great Buckeye State from "an unapologetic liberal named John Kerry," and for delivering the spoils to Bush.
Jan. 6, 2005:
Democrats interrupt electoral vote count, force brief debate on Ohio elections

Jan. 4, 2005:
The recount that wasn't, a chance to reassure voters missed
by Steven Leser, Elites TV
# The recount that wasn't, for the election that wasn't, of the President that isn't ...   =Phil H.=
Jan. 3, 2005:
Bush asks judge to toss Ohio election suit
  • Ohio recount highlights continuing vote trouble
  • Vote protesters try last hurrah
  • Vote challengers accuse Blackwell of trying to let 'clock run out'
Jan. 3, 2005:
Is there one senator who will stand up for black voters?

Jan. 2, 2005:
Footprints of electoral fraud: Early numbers

Dec. 31, 2004:
Greens, Libertarians re-open Ohio lawsuit
Excerpt:  "We've documented in this filing how this recount was not conducted in accordance with uniform standards throughout Ohio" as required by the U.S. Constitution, said John Bonifaz, a lawyer from the National Voting Right Institute representing the candidates.

Ohio law requires an elections board to manually recount a randomly selected 3 percent of ballots. If the totals match certified results for those precincts, all the county's votes are then machine-counted. If the hand count is off, a county must manually recount all its ballots.

The filing, part of an ongoing lawsuit originally brought by a county board of elections to stop the recount, alleges counties did not randomly select precincts for the manual recount and some workers altered votes to prevent a full hand count.
Dec. 31, 2004:
Ohio's official non-recount ends amidst new evidence
of fraud, theft and judicial contempt mirrored in New Mexico


Dec. 27, 2004
Evidence of fraud and disenfranchisement in Ohio: A partial list

Dec. 25, 2004:
Ohio numbers support claims of Triad fraud

Dec. 23, 2004:
Video supports Ohio vote fraud claim revealed
# TruthOut says the video supports and adds to the Hocking County elections official's affidavit, and I have no reason to doubt TruthOut, but the video didn't work on our computer.   =H&HH=
Dec. 23, 2004:
Guide to New Mexico vote irregularities
PDF FILE (REQUIRES ADOBE ACROBAT)

Dec. 23, 2004:
Warren County recount - snookered? What Happened?

Dec. 22, 2004:
In Ohio, almost 1 in 50 votes for president didn't count
Congressman seeks exit poll data


Dec. 21, 2004
Election results in southwestern Ohio

Dec. 21, 2004:
Election official “must have mis-heard” about patch installed on computer
and other unknown news about the very odd 2004 election

      . Democrats' lawyer asks Blackwell for investigation of TRIAD tampering
      . Congressman implicated in vote fraud
      . Recount continues in Ohio as vote machine company makes odd "service calls"
      . Recount observer not allowed to inspect machines
      . Ohio Justice throws out election challenge
      . Ohio election officials obstruct recount, say Greens
      . Kerry, Bush pick up votes in Ohio
      . "Please, please, please, count all the votes"
      . Election challenge refiled by activists
      . “Everyone felt better” after technician “repeated a repair”
      . Votes ought to be counted

Dec. 20, 2004
“Default settings” on Mahoning County voting machines

Dec. 20, 2004:
Global Election Systems email proves
they knew votes were not all counted
Excerpt:  "One more interesting thing to note: the AccuVote knows that it has dropped the ballot. So the question has always been, should we increment the card counter, and should we log the event. Currently we do neither. There are two schools here. One says we should notify the voter, log it, add a dropped ballot counter, send an incident report to the secretary of state, etc etc. The other is to increment the counter and send the voter on their ignorantly blissful way. Right now we kind of split the difference."

# So, they didn't increment the counter, they didn't log the event, and they sent the voter on his/her ignorantly blissful way? What if they put these machines in places with Democratic majorities?   =Underground Panther in the Sky=
Dec. 18, 2004:
An introduction to ... The stolen election of 2004

Dec. 18, 2004:
Ohio vote count battles escalate amidst
new evidence of potential criminal activity


Dec. 18, 2004:
Cuyahoga County ballots seemed “pre-sorted” to volunteers

Dec. 15, 2004:
Proof of Ohio election fraud exposed
Excerpt:  TRIAD is owned by a man named Tod Rapp, who has also donated money to both the Republican Party and the election campaign of George W. Bush. TRIAD manufactures punch-card voting systems, and also wrote the computer program that tallied the punch-card votes cast in 41 Ohio counties last November.

... A representative from TRIAD Systems came into a county board of elections office un-announced. He said he was just stopping by to see if they had any questions about the up-coming recount. He then headed into the back room where the TRIAD supplied Tabulator (a card reader and older PC with custom software) is kept. He told them there was a problem and the system had a bad battery and had "lost all of its data". He then took the computer apart and started swapping parts in and out of it and another "spare" tower type PC also in the room. He may have had spare parts in his coat as one of the BOE people moved it and remarked as to how very heavy it was. He finally re-assembled everything and said it was working but to not turn it off.

He then asked which precinct would be counted for the 3% recount test, and the one which had been selected as it had the right number of votes, was relayed to him. He then went back and did something else to the tabulator computer.

The TRIAD Systems representative suggested that since the hand count had to match the machine count exactly, and since it would be hard to memorize the several numbers which would be needed to get the count to come out exactly right, that they should post this series of numbers on the wall where they would not be noticed by observers. He suggested making them look like employee information or something similar. The people doing the hand count could then just report these numbers no matter what the actual count of the ballots revealed. This would then "match" the tabulator report for this precinct exactly. The numbers were apparently the final certified counts for the selected precinct.
Dec. 14, 2004:
Zogby insists polls were "very, very good, extremely accurate"
. Professor says vote numbers don't add up
. Congressman wants 'raw' exit poll data
. Who did voters pick on Nov. 2?    In some cases, we'll never know
. Former Congressman jailed for confronting Blackwell
. Ohio Supreme Court won’t block certification?
. Some voters hold out hope for Kerry victory
. Ohio counties dealing differently with Kerry recount requests
. FBI, Congressional staffers curious
   about self-described vote fraud programmer
Dec. 13, 2004:
See for yourself or read the transcript
Programmer's testimony before
U.S. House Judiciary Committee
Excerpt:  Mr Curtis, are there programs that can be used to secretly fix elections? Yes.

How do you know that to be the case? Because in October of 2000 I wrote a prototype for present Congressman Tom Feeney, at the company I work for in Oviedo, Florida, that did just that.

And when you say, "Did just that," it would rig an election? It would flip the vote fifty-one forty-nine to whoever you wanted it to go to, and whichever race you wanted it to win.

And would that program that you designed be something that elections officials, that might be on county boards of elections, could detect? They'd never see it.

This is just a prediction, of course, but I'll wager this will still be unknown news years from now.   =H&HH= | LINK
Dec. 13, 2004:
Ex-Congressman’s account of arrest for speaking to Blackwell
Excerpt:  So at around 10 am, Carrie and I went to the front desk with a copy of the Conyers letter and presented our driver's licenses. We were told to wait while the receptionist called the Secretary of State's office, which told her "someone will come down and get the letter."

At that point, we retreated to Zuppa's, a very untrendy cafe located on the north side of the lobby. We ordered orange juice and sat down at a table. Within minutes, security was all over us.

"You must leave this building now,” said an exasperated Borden security cop, his hands shaking quite visibly.

“What’s the charge?” I asked. “Are we trespassing or do you just ‘reserve the right to refuse service to anyone?’”

“You must leave this building now,” he repeated. ...
Dec. 13, 2004:
Ohio vote fraud battle heats up
by Katherine Yurica, Axis of Logic

Dec. 13, 2004:
Startling new revelations highlight
rare Congressional hearings on Ohio vote


Dec. 12, 2004:
20 amazing facts about voting in the USA

Dec. 12, 2004:
Ohio absentee vote inflated

Dec. 12, 2004:
Blackwell's "locked-down" Ohio poll records left in unlocked building

Dec. 11, 2004:
Complete original exit polls from 2004 election

Dec. 11, 2004:
Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) pays $2.6-million to settle California lawsuit

Dec. 11, 2004:
Ohio election investigation thwarted by surprise Blackwell order
Excerpt:  On Friday December 10 two certified volunteers for the Ohio Recount team assigned to Greene County were in process recording voting information from minority precincts in Greene County, and were stopped mid-count by a surprise order from Secretary of State Blackwell’s office. The Director Board of Elections stated that “all voter records for the state of Ohio were “locked-down,” and now they are not considered public records.”
Dec. 10, 2004:
Zogby insists polls were "very, very good, extremely accurate"

. Professor says vote numbers don't add up
. Congressman wants 'raw' exit poll data
. Who did voters pick on Nov. 2?   In some cases, we'll never know
. Former Congressman jailed for confronting Blackwell
. Ohio Supreme Court won’t block certification
. Some voters hold out hope for Kerry victory
. Ohio counties dealing differently with Kerry recount requests
. FBI, Congressional staffers curious about
  self-described vote fraud programmer

Dec. 10, 2004:
Blackwell locks out recount volunteers,
claims voter records not public documents


Dec. 10, 2004:
Uncounted votes in Ohio's Montgomery County

Dec. 9, 2004:
Trouble counting votes in Ohio

Dec. 7, 2004:
Florida e-vote study debunked by statisticians

Dec. 7, 2004:
As questions keep coming, Ohio certifies its vote count

. New round of challenges in Ohio vote
. Kerry team finally, halfheartedly joins Ohio recount fight
. LePore served with lawsuit at elections meeting
. Greens, Libertarians seek recounts in New Mexico, Nevada


Dec. 7, 2004:
Nation editor spars with reporter over election questions
Why, it's David Corn -- who also dismissed questions about September 11


Dec. 7, 2004:
Evidence dramatically raises suspicion of election tampering
"The bigger the prize, the bigger the discrepancy"


Nov. 6, 2004:
Democrats launch investigation of voting problems in Ohio

Dec. 6, 2004:
Democratic Underground bars Black Box Voting's Harris

Dec. 5, 2004:
Evidence of fraud in the 2004 U.S. Presidential election: A reader

Dec. 5, 2004:

 Bubbling below the surface of credibility ...
 ... which doesn't necessarily mean it ain't true:

Whistleblower's affidavit:
Programmer built vote-rigging prototype
at Republican Congressman's request
Excerpt:  The programmer claims that he designed and built a "vote rigging" software program at the behest of then Florida Congressman, now U.S. Congressman, Republican Tom Feeney of Florida's 24th Congressional District.

Clint Curtis, 46, claims that he built the software for Feeney in 2000 while working at a software design and engineering company in Oviedo, Florida (Feeney's home district).

Why the Feeney vote-rigging story
sounds like disinformation

by Bev Harris, Black Box Voting

BradBlog's response to Harris

Dec. 4, 2004:
Slow-rolling democracy in Ohio
by Robert Parrt, Consortium News

Dec. 3, 2004:
News editors poo-poo election fraud rumors

Dec. 3, 2004:
FBI refuses to accept complaint alleging Ohio vote fraud
Excerpt:  In a November 30 article titled "Nearly a Month Later, Ohio Fight Goes On," detailing the controversy in Ohio over the results of the November 2 election, the Associated Press correctly identified J. Kenneth Blackwell -- who, as Ohio's secretary of state, oversees the election process -- as "a co-chairman of Bush's re-election campaign in Ohio." But two large news organizations, FOXNews.com and the Chicago Sun-Times, omitted that reference from their versions of the story.
Dec. 1, 2004:
Major media hints at nationwide voting problems

Dec. 1, 2004:
Voters to challenge Ohio election

Dec. 1, 2004:
FOXNews.com, Chicago Sun-Times deleted connection
between Ohio official, Bush campaign from AP story


Nov. 30 and Dec. 1, 2004:
Something's fishy in Ohio
by Jesse Jackson, syndicated columnist
and Jackson column draws heat from Ohio Sec. of State's Office

Nov. 30, 2004:
BlackBoxVoting sues Palm Beach County

Nov. 30, 2004:
Where there's smoke, there's fire
Electronic voting and the legitimacy of the 2004 Presidential election


Nov. 30, 2004:
People for the American Way sues to have Ohio provisional ballots counted
. Nearly a month later, fight over Ohio count goes on
. Jesse Jackson seeks voting probe
. More questions raised about Ohio vote
. Judge says Ohio recount must wait until after election is certified
. Florida group sues over election results
. Kerry picks up 1,070 more votes in Ohio
. Commission says voting problems were widespread
. Concerned locals push for presidential election fraud probe
Nov. 29, 2004:
How to take back a stolen election
by Thom Hartmann, Common Dreams

Nov. 26, 2004:
Odds for red shift in 16 states: One out of 4.5 billion

Nov. 26, 2004:
Grass-roots movement tries to trick CNN
into practicing journalism in Ohio
# One of the diarists on the Daily Kos is urging people to go to CNN's webpage and request customized email alerts on the topics "Ohio elections" and "voting irregularities." The idea is that CNN might actually give the story some coverage if they are faced with overwhelming demand for it. CNN wants you to register in order to do this, so have your fake ID ready.   =Madeline Zane=
Nov. 25, 2004
New Ohio voter transcripts feed floodtide
of doubt about Republican election manipulation


Nov. 24, 2004:
US offers hypocritical response on Ukraine election

Nov. 23, 2004:
Greens, Libertarians sue to stop stonewalling on Ohio recount
  • Lawsuit challenges Nevada’s Republican electors
  • Ohio Finds at least 2,600 ballots counted twice
  • Lingering doubts about 2004 election
Nov. 22, 2004:
Widespread election fraud in Cleveland?

Nov. 21, 2004:
Help wanted: Last chance to count Nevada vote

Nov. 19, 2004:
'Stinking evidence' of possible election fraud found in Florida

Nov. 18, 2004:
Research team sounds 'smoke alarm' for Florida e-vote count

Nov. 18, 2004:
"Something is definitely wrong," says Zogby

Nov. 18, 2004
Voting machines count backwards in Oklahoma

Nov. 17, 2004:
Consistant swing from exit polls to Bush vote unexplained

Nov. 17, 2004:
Minority precincts were deliberately shortchanged on voting equipment
Many people waited hours to vote ... while many more gave up and left


Nov. 16, 2004:
Ohio vote to be recounted
Greens and Libertarians fund re-count together


Nov. 16, 2004:
While the news networks were covering Scott Peterson's trial ...

  • Election stolen, group suspects
  • Hackers rigging voting machines a real possibility
  • Complaints of election theft quickly, efficiently dismissed
  • Wacky turnout totals just another glitch
  • Computer glitch elects wrong candidate in Indiana
  • Minnesotans kicked off voter registration lists are still asking why
  • Nader seeks limited recount of optical-scan vote in New Hampshire
  • Worst voter error is apathy toward irregularities
Nov. 16, 2004:
What can we do about the stolen election?
by Atomicktom and Helen & Harry Highwater, Unknown News

Nov. 12, 2004:
Major bugs found in Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) vote systems

Nov. 11, 2004:
Kerry lawyers eye Ohio recounts
but insist effort isn't aimed at challenging results


Nov. 11, 2004:
GOP wants to end exit polls
# Now that they control the vote counting, of course they do!   =Phil H.=

Excerpt:  Republican National Committee Chairman Ed Gillespie said he was personally affected by the early reports, discouraged by what he was seeing. "But I've been through this before," he said. "In 2000 the exit data was wrong on Election Day. In 2002, the exit returns were wrong on Election Day. And in 2004, the exit data were wrong on Election Day -- all three times, by the way, in a way that skewed against Republicans and had a dispiriting effect on Republican voters across the country."

Gillespie's implication that the final tally was correct, but the exit polls were wrong implies that our voting process is flawless and the people building our voting machines are nonpartisan and only interested in seeing a fair election.

Anyone with the slightest knowledge of the seriousness of the widespread problems we have with our voting systems or the highly compromised partisans running our voting machine companies knows a truly fair election is not possible.

Why would the GOP want to eliminate exit polls? Because it's the last semi- independent check of an election's accuracy and the only way to quickly determine if the votes cast for a candidate match those counted by the machines.
Nov. 11, 2004:
Green, Libertarian candidates demand Ohio recount

Nov. 10, 2004:
Florida e-vote fraud? Unlikely

Nov. 9, 2004:
A stolen election?

Nov. 9, 2004:
Bush's 'incredible' vote tallies

Nov. 8, 2004:
The e-vote factor: Kerry conceded but did he really lose?

Nov. 8, 2004:
Media blackout on vote fraud allegations

Nov. 7, 2004:
With 638 votes cast, Bush leads 4,258 to 260
... and other amusing anecdotes
from the stolen election of 2004

  • Absentee votes draw Florida eye
  • Kerry leads in Ohio exit polling
  • Newspaper denied access at polls
  • Foreign monitors 'barred' from US polls
  • Journalist beaten, arrested outside Florida polling place for violating secret rule
  • Countless other frauds occurred ...
  • Defective software 'lost' votes


Nov. 6, 2004:
Evidence mounts that the vote may have been hacked
Excerpt:  Election night, I'd been doing live election coverage for WDEV, one of the radio stations that carries my syndicated show, and, just after midnight, during the 12:20 a.m. Associated Press Radio News feed, I was startled to hear the reporter detail how Karen Hughes had earlier sat George W. Bush down to inform him that he'd lost the election. The exit polls were clear: Kerry was winning in a landslide. "Bush took the news stoically," noted the AP report.
Nov. 5, 2004:
Should America trust the results of the election?
Editorial, The Washington Dispatch
Excerpt:  Without question, the evidence presented thus far should raise suspicion among honest individuals. While maintaining a calm and reasonable demeanor, the results of the Novermber 2nd election should be fully investigated simply for the sake of the nation and our future confidence in the democratic process.
Nov. 5, 2004:
Something amiss in Ohio

Nov. 4, 2004:
Was the Ohio election honest and fair?
Press release, Progressive Newswire
Excerpt:  Ohio State Senator Teresa Fedor said today: "There was trouble with our elections in Ohio at every stage. It's been a battle getting people registered to vote, getting to the ballot on voting day and getting that vote to count. There is a pattern of voter suppression; that's why I called for [Ohio Secretary of State] Blackwell's resignation more than a month ago. Blackwell, while claiming to run an unbiased elections process, was also the co-chair of the Bush-Cheney campaign in Ohio.
Nov. 4, 2004:
First of all, this election was definitely rigged
by Mark Crispin Miller, Salon

Nov. 4, 2004:
States with electronic voting machines gave Bush mysterious 5% advantage

Nov. 4, 2004:
More votes than voters?

Nov. 4, 2004:
Kerry won. Here's the facts.

Nov. 4, 2004:
Evidence of fraud is indisputable ... but there is no accountability

Nov. 4, 2004:
4,000+ votes vanish in one county
Excerpt:  The county's technical consultants contacted UniLect Corp., the manufacturer of Carteret County's electronic voting system, had given misinformation about how many votes the system can store.

The county was told its units could store up to 10,500 votes when, in fact, the limit is 3,005 votes.
Nov. 4, 2004:
Computer glitch still baffles county clerk

Nov. 4, 2004:
Were the absentee ballots lost or stolen? Either way, it's a crime.

Nov. 3, 2004:
Photo shows voter fraud in Ohio?
Excerpt:  The poll managers had such an extensive list of voters rights and regulations that they had to follow, including it being illegal to have any partisan buttons etc. in the polling place, yet the ballots for voters in over 40 precincts were put in the hands of Bush-Cheney partisans.

I don't know whether the Bush partisans did or didn't play any games with the ballots they received, but it sure doesn't look good, and I wonder whether it's even legal. And let's not forget, this is a state that was already well on its way to becoming the new Florida of GOP election fraud.
Nov. 3, 2004:
Florida numbers don't add up

Nov. 3, 2004:
America is screwed:  Election stolen again
Excerpt:  In most states, the returns were pretty much as predicted by the last polls. Florida seems the odd exception -- the last polls were for Kerry, 49-44%, but the returns are running 52-47 Bush.

So in just one day -- and in just one state -- Bush went from five points down to five points ahead.
Nov. 3, 2004:
All exit polls matched results ... except Ohio, Florida

Nov. 3, 2004:
Graph:   Exit polls vs. E-vote tallies

Nov. 3, 2004:
Where did Bush get 8,000,000 new voters?
Statistical analysis:  George Bush's 8 million new votes found
Nov. 3, 2004:
Votes lost in cyberspace

Nov. 3, 2004:
Presidential votes miscast on e-voting
machines throughout the country


Nov. 3, 2004:
CNN just changed their Ohio exit poll page

Nov. 2, 2004:
BlackBoxVoting files fleet of FOIA requests
Excerpt:  At 8:30 p.m. Election Night, Black Box Voting blanketed the U.S. with the first in a series of public records requests, to obtain internal computer logs and other documents from 3,000 individual counties and townships. Networks called the election before anyone bothered to perform even the most rudimentary audit.

... Among the first requests sent to counties (with all kinds of voting systems -- optical scan, touch-screen, and punch card) is a formal records request for internal audit logs, polling place results slips, modem transmission logs, and computer trouble slips.

An earlier FOIA is more sensitive, and has not been disclosed here. We will notify you as soon as we can go public with it.
Nov. 2, 2004:
Group tallies more than 1,100 e-voting glitches

Nov. 2, 2004:
Watchdogs spot e-vote glitches

Nov. 1, 2004:
One million Kerry votes stolen before election day

Oct. 28, 2004:
58,000 absentee ballots lost in Florida

Oct. 26, 2004:
E-voting companies reveal some software to feds

Oct. 26, 2004:
New Florida vote scandal feared
by Greg Palast, BBC News
Excerpt:  A secret document obtained from inside Bush campaign headquarters in Florida suggests a plan - possibly in violation of US law - to disrupt voting in the state's African-American voting districts, a BBC Newsnight investigation reveals.

Two e-mails, prepared for the executive director of the Bush campaign in Florida and the campaign's national research director in Washington DC, contain a 15-page so-called "caging list".

It lists 1,886 names and addresses of voters in predominantly black and traditionally Democrat areas of Jacksonville, Florida.

An elections supervisor in Tallahassee, when shown the list, told Newsnight: "The only possible reason why they would keep such a thing is to challenge voters on election day."

... In Jacksonville, to determine if Republicans were using the lists or other means of intimidating voters, we filmed a private detective filming every "early voter" - the majority of whom are black - from behind a vehicle with blacked-out windows.

The private detective claimed not to know who was paying for his all-day services.
Oct. 22, 2004:
Some early voters say machines mark incorrect choices

Oct. 20, 2004:
Republican-backed group allegedly involved
in Pennsylvania vote registration fraud


Oct. 16, 2004:
Florida's Bush ignored advice to
'pull the plug' on flawed felon voter list


Oct. 12, 2004:
Republican-backed group allegedly involved
in vote registration fraud in Nevada and Oregon
  • Republicans phone voters to discourage Democrats' voting

Oct. 9, 2004:
Republican dirty tricks in Ohio

Sept. 8, 2004:
November surprise:  Electronic voting machines add uncertainty to close election race

Aug. 30, 2004:
Florida fixed again? Absentee ballots go AWOL
Excerpt:  Although 37,000 citizens have requested absentee ballots, Supervisor of Elections Theresa LePore says she'd only received 22,000 when she began the count. Where are the others? Don't ask: though she posts the names of requesters, she won't release the list of those who have voted, an eyebrow-raising deviation from standard procedure.
Aug. 26, 2004:
Diebold (now Premier Election Solutions) central tabulator contains stunning security hole
Excerpt:  By entering a 2-digit code in a hidden location, a second set of votes is created. This set of votes can be changed, so that it no longer m