Welcome to UNKNOWN NEWS "News that's not known, or not known enough."
Helen & Harry Highwater's cranky weblog of news and opinion.
   
Are you full of crap or what?      Can I redesign your website?
Do you want to switch hosts?      Do you have an RSS feed?
How do you decide what news goes where?      Wanna exchange links?
Are you conspiracy kooks?
What kind of news are you looking for?      What's the point?
Will you give me a free ad?      Why did you hit me with a pop-up ad?
Why did you reject my submission?
Why do you publish obscenities?
Why don't you answer or even acknowledge my emails?
Why don't you have a message board?      Are you on Twitter?
Why haven't you published my article or e-mail?
Where's your mobile site?
You're just another __________      You're not credible     

What's the point?

At Unknown News, we believe in liberty and justice for all, so of course, we oppose many US government policies. Here's a more detailed introduction to who we are and what we're about.

We present a once-weekly round-up of generally "unknown news" from credible sources, along with intelligent (we try!) commentary and dialogue on current events.

Unlike CNN and your daily newspaper, Unknown News is not "fair and impartial, objective journalism," because we'll never pretend not to care. We are deeply concerned about fading freedoms in America, and US foreign policy that exports death instead of liberty.

If you're concerned too, we'd love to say howdy and show you around.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Are you full of crap or what?
I can't believe you linked to an article reporting ...

Unknown News does not employ reporters in Boston, Baghdad, or anywhere else. Our news links lead to mainstream professional journalistic sources (or, rarely, to independent sources we know and trust without reservation), but we don't have fact-checkers scrutinizing mainstream media reports, and we cannot guarantee the factual accuracy of every assertion in every article we link to. We recommend skepticism, always.

If you believe a particular news report we've linked to is factually incorrect, you're invited to write to us and explain why. If your retort is written coherently, we'll publish it.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Are you conspiracy kooks?

We're willing to consider conspiracy theories, when they make sense. And that's rarely.

As a broad generalization, conspiracy theorists believe that many or most of life's larger international, financial, and political aspects are controlled by the wealthy and well-connected, who often meet and strategize amongst themselves.

We certainly believe that. What we doubt are people who think they understand it all, or even a tiny fragment, and want to explain it to everyone.

For example, consider President Kennedy's assassination: Anyone who's made even a cursory but honest examination of the facts recognizes that the Warren Commission was commissioned to calm the country, not to ferret out the facts. There's simply no reasonable doubt that JFK's assassination was a multi-person job -- which means it was a conspiracy, by the definition of the word. But that's as far as we're willing to go, because that's all we know for sure. We don't know the real story of who killed JFK ... and neither do you.

Likewise, consider September 11: There were too many coincidences that morning, and too many of the reported facts don't fit. We don't see how anyone could honestly consider the evidence without demanding a genuine investigation that isn't drenched in political pressures. But that's as far as we're willing to go, because that's all we know for sure. We don't know the real story of September 11 ... and neither do you.

And neither do the amateurs who dig through articles, trying to put together the pieces. And neither do the people who write such articles. We doubt anyone who thinks they've unraveled everything and know the super-secret truth, especially if they're offering to sell you a copy for a small fee.

More distastefully, "Jews controlling the world" seems central to many popular conspiracy theories these days, and that's an angle that bores and repulses us. All the Jews we've ever known seem just like everyone else -- it's the Jew-haters that terrify us.

Robert Shea, co-author of the conspiracy classic Illuminatus, was a friend of Harry's, so we know that it's possible to be a conspiracy nut and still be a sane, decent, intelligent, even skeptical human being. But basically, conspiracy theories bore us. We prefer to deal in facts.

—H&HH
 Top of page  
Can I redesign your website?
It really needs better graphics, more color, flash animation ...

Unknown News must be the ugliest site on the web, as at least once a month we hear from someone who's eager to redesign our pages.

If there's a problem with this site's functionality or readability — a link doesn't work or you find a font difficult to read — please let us know (unknownnews at inbox.com). If you have a specific suggestion that would make the site more informative, appealing, or intuitive for users, we'd love to hear from you.

If you want Unknown News to have a snazzier look, the answer is probably thanks, but no. Our site looks amateur because it is amateur. We've taught ourselves enough HTML to make words and occasionally images appear on your screen. We want the words to be easily read, the images sharp and clear, and we want the overall presentation to be tastefully restrained — straightforward and uncluttered.

We don't want our site to look as slick as a corporate news site (or some other weblogs). We don't want a glittering logo, flashing colors, or special effects trailing the cursor. We don't want an animated American flag fluttering upside-down, and we don't want users to hear a funeral durge when they click to our main page. We eschew applications which would render this site inaccessible to people using older computers or browsers. We're not going to employ design gimmicks we don't understand ourselves, and we have little interest in learning new design gimmicks.

If the site looks a little old-fashioned and low-tech, it's because your hosts, Helen & Harry, ARE a little old-fashioned and low-tech.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Do you have an RSS feed?

At long last the answer is yes, we have an RSS feed.

Updated daily, the feed is at http://unknownnews.org/RSSfeeds/dailyRSS.xml, and there's a little more information on this page.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Do you want to switch hosts?

Now and then we hear from folks who like the website, and want to offer us hosting at a discount. Some of these saints even offer hosting for nothin'. We appreciate the heck out of the offer, but the answer is no.

We're on our third host now; the first two were spotty at best, one with lots of down time and the other with lots of down time plus a note asking us to tone down the politics.

And both times we've switched, it's been a hellish ordeal with the old host's alleged "customer service" department.

Our current host is pair.com, and they're not the cheapest ... but their rates are reasonable, and we get our money's worth. They've been down about 15 minutes over the past three years. When we have technical difficulties, pair.com offers actual customer service. And they've never given half a hoot what the heck we publish.

So we appreciate the offer, but we're going to stay where we are. :)
—H&HH
 Top of page  
How do you decide what news goes where?

For the most part, we don't decide diddly.

When we find a news article we feel is generally 'unknown' or outrageous, we place it near the top of the page. And we try to sort news by topic, so all the items related to one particular scandal or outrage are grouped together. After that, though, we make little or no attempt to "rank" the day's news by importance. Everything is presented in pretty much the order it's found — newest items near the top, older items near the bottom.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Wanna exchange links?

In a word, no. We link to sites because we're recommending them, not as part of any quid pro quo. We find the widespread practice of websites "trading links" to be silly and masturbatory, and "please exchange links" form letters are worse: they're simply spam, sent to who-knows-how-many websites -- and we do treat such emails as spam.

We will, of course, cheerfully link to any site we like, and we'll quickly check out any site anyone seriously suggests. And when we do, we don't expect or demand that these sites link back to us.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Will you give me a free ad?

Depends. We sell ads to help support our website, and we also give solidarity ads to support other projects that, in our opinion, deserve support. We're won't give solidarity ads to sites or projects we don't wholeheartedly endorse. That means the answer is no for anything comprised entirely or almost entirely of merchandise for sale, or run by incorporated companies, or entities which pay for ads elsewhere, or anyone we think is in it solely for the money. And of course, we'll delete your email the instant we suspect it's spam.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
What kind of news are you looking for?

By definition, unknown means most folks don't know about it and news means it's something new. We're generally looking for links which are either unknown or news, or preferably both. We're particularly interested in news about government, corporate, and other corruption, malfeasance, atrocities, and et cetera.

For more information, see our guidelines. Also, please don't send attachments.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Why do you publish obscenities?
What on earth do you think is gained by coining vulgar headlines such as "Louisianans may not take it up the ass, Court rules"? That's funny, I suppose, in a low-brow way, but it doesn't exactly enhance your credibility. If you want to be respected as journalists, try reporting the facts in a respectable, journalistic fashion.
We don't "want to be respected as journalists." We want to tell the truth, and here's some truth:

The article you're asking about reports, in family-friendly language, that a panel of highly-educated and highly-paid judges spent many days hearing detailed arguments about blow jobs and buttfucking. These judges, paid by tax dollars, presumably considered objections and affidavits about rimming and lube and licking balls.

Is that offensive?

In the end, these oh-so-respectable judges decided that the state, not the individual, has the final say on any citizen's desire to open his or her mouth or bunghole for pleasure. They decided that Louisianans may not take it up the ass. That's offensive.

What on earth would be gained by cloaking such news with an obfuscating headline like "Court rules against gay activists" or "Sex laws upheld by court" or some such?

To anyone who isn't violently allergic to freedom, the Court's decision is far more vulgar and offensive than any consensual sex act. We are not "objective journalists," so we won't shade the true nature of repression with the blandest words we can find.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Why don't you answer or even acknowledge my emails?

We answer almost every email we read. We do not, however, READ every email we receive.

The work here is done by just two people, and we have only a few hours daily to go through hundreds of incoming emails. Like almost any other publication, we have guidelines for writers. We've tried to include links to our guidelines at just about every mention of our email address, but if you haven't read the guidelines, we probably haven't read or even received your submission.

Of course, a lot of people don't, won't, and never will read the guidelines, or they think we'll make an exception for them (we won't), so they send attachments (which gets their emails auto-deleted), or they send stuff that's wildly at odds with what we're looking for. Or they send attachments, which of course gets an email instantly deleted.

Sorry if this sounds brusque, but we must spend our time working on the website, and writers who obviously haven't read the guidelines waste time we don't have. We rarely even respond, and if we receive several such submissions from the same sender, we'll eventually filter mail from that address into the trash.

Please read the guidelines.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Why don't you have a message board?

We read our incoming emails and publish the best of them -- and you're sincerely invited to participate. But no, we don't have an automated message board that'll put stupid comments on-line instantly, because we don't want any random stupid idiot's stupid comments on our website. We prefer the slower, more thoughtful pace of updating the conversation once daily, instead of instantaneously whenever anyone sends a comment. Posting updates only once daily helps us (and maybe other people) stop and think before rushing a reply, and allows us to keep the trolls out.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Are you on Twitter?

Yup. We're old farts and we don't really get it, but heck, we didn't get the internet for a few years either. We tweet at twitter.com/unknownnews every time we update our main page, or make additions to our bad cops page, the mountain of right-wing lies or coded calls to violence, or other updates that might arguably be worth a click.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Where's your mobile site?

We don't have a site for cell phones. We work hard on our website, we do it all in our spare time, and I'll be hornswaggled up my butt cheeks if we're going to do it all again just so you can see it on your gol durn telephone.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Why did you hit me with a pop-up ad?

We didn't. We don't do pop-ups, pop-unders, or any shenanigans remotely like that.  We never have, we never will, and we'd like to see such shenanigators tarred and feathered and drawn and quartered.

If you saw a pop-up at our website, your computer is carrying malware or spyware. You may have visited a website that launched a "pop-under" ad, or that launched "pop-up" ads when you left that site. You may have (intentionally or inadvertantly) installed free programs that trigger pop-up ads at random intervals, or whenever you type certain keywords.

We're not experts, so we can't give much advice on what you should do about your problem, beyond the obvious:

Of course, you're using a good firewall, and of course you have anti-virus software and anti-spyware software that's regularly updated, yes?

Here's a relevant newsgroup, peopled with many good souls who know much more than we do. Here's a pertinent post.

One way or another, two things are certain:

1:  Nasty people have written nefarious software that's up and running on your computer. And ...
2:  We're not the nasty people who gave you this nefarious software.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Why did you reject my submission?

We receive a surprisingly large and growing number of submissions, but our time and budget are so tightly limited we're only able to publish material that absolutely knocks us on our asses. That's an utterly subjective standard, and it unavoidably means we say "no thanks" to many fine articles.

If you've read the guidelines but we still reject your article, please don't take it personally. Most of the material we reject is just fine, even better-than-average, so don't give up. If you think we've made a big mistake, you may be right, and we'd love to hear from you again.

Of course, if you haven't read the guidelines, we probably haven't read or even received your submission.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
Why haven't you published my article or e-mail?

We receive a lot of email, and we can't go through it any quicker than we go through it. As Scottie would say, we canna break the laws of physics.

At hectic peaks, it may be as long as three days before we read and reply or publish an email. And it takes lots of time to edit, code, and prep articles, so "think pieces" (commentary that isn't directly related to current news, or complicated material that requires us to really think) are a somewhat lower priority for us than news, and may be delayed up to several days.

It's also possible that we never got your email, especially if you included an attachment, or if you're the kind of dickwad who sends lots of emails to lots of strangers.

Also, it's entirely possible that your article or email sucked, and that's why we haven't printed it. We usually send polite 'rejection notes' for articles that don't make the cut, but uninteresting emails and unreadable articles are simply deleted.
—H&HH
 Top of page  
You're just another __________ You're not credible

It's remarkable (and remarkably sad) how often we hear from people who've skimmed one article here, or glanced at a headline or two, and promptly decided we're left-wing loonies or right-wing nuts or [fill in the blank].

Actually, we think left and right are both wrong about a lot of things. We always suggest newcomers read About Unknown News or glance at this FAQ before imagining they've got us pegged.
Another recurring theme in our in-box is that Unknown News isn't credible, because it's not "objective." Again, we point to the about us page, or if we're feeling chatty we might explain it one more time:

You won't find much corporate or government malfeasance, if you only trust sources directly affiliated with corporate or government offices.

If you think we're wrong about something, you might be right. Please, tell us what we're mistaken about — a specific article or concept — and we'll be happy to consider your points.

We won't waste time, though, with people who argue without thinking, or offer only insults. If your mind is sealed shut, Unknown News ain't for you, so toodle-doo. We wish you well.

Just watch whatever network news you choose, and pretend you know what's going on ...
—H&HH
 Top of page  

Scroll down or click for more 
unknownnews.org/debunk.html 

Scroll down or click for more 
unknownnews.org/cops.html 
Scroll down or click for more 
unknownnews.org/
rwradicals.html 


Our mystery links
(mostly just for fun)

Links in red are not safe for
work, and links in pink
include audio and/or video.

Scroll down or click for more 
unknownnews.org/oldnews.html 



©   Helen & Harry Highwater and the individual authors.

Big howdy           No nuts, please           Our privacy policies
Bill of Rights           Declaration of Independence

   


Subscribe to our RSS feed  Follow us on Twitter
Like the URL says, this website is about unknown news.

We present a once-weekly wrap-up of news that was underplayed, ignored, or simply lost in the non-stop news cycle. Our news comes only from mainstream, professional journalists or (rarely) other sources we trust entirely, with no nuttiness and no interest in the same news you see everywhere else.

What we believe

We believe in liberty and justice for all, so of course, we oppose many US government policies. This doesn't mean we're anti-American, redneck scum, pinko commies, militia members, or terrorist-sympathizers. It means we believe in freedom, as more than merely a cliché.

We believe you have the right to live your own life as you choose, and others have the equal right to live their lives as they choose. It's not complicated.

We believe freedom leads to peace, progress, and prosperity, while its opposite -- oppression -- leads to war, terrorism, poverty, and misery.

We believe it's preposterously stupid to hate people because of their appearance, their race or nationality, their religion or lack of religion, how they have sex with other consenting adults, etc. There are far more apropos reasons to hate most people.

We believe in questioning ourselves, our assumptions, each other -- and we especially believe in questioning authority (the more authority, the more questions). We believe obedience is a fine quality in dogs and young children, but not in adults.

Like America's right-wingers, we believe in individual responsibility, hard work to get ahead, and stern punishment for serious crimes. We believe big government should not be blindly trusted.

But unlike most right-wing leaders, we mean it.

Like America's left-wingers, we believe in equal treatment under law, war as a last (not first) resort, and sensible stewardship of natural resources. We believe big business should not be blindly trusted.

But unlike most left-wing leaders, we mean it.

Like libertarians, we believe it's wrong and reprehensible to arrest people for what they think, believe, look like, wear, eat, smoke, drink, inhale, inject, or otherwise do to themselves.

But unlike many libertarians, we're not obsessed with the gold standard, we don't believe incorporation is humanity's highest achievement, and we don't believe everything in life comes down to dollars and cents. We've read and enjoyed Ayn Rand's novels, but we understand that they're works of fiction.

We're skeptical, and we're sick of so-called 'journalists' who aren't skeptical at all.

A reader asks, what are our solutions?

We propose no solutions except common sense, which is never common. We like the principles of democracy, and the ideals broadly described as 'American'. The US Constitution is a fine and workable framework for solutions, when it's actually read and thoughtfully understood by intelligent statesmen and women. So, no manifestos from us. We don't dream that big, and if there's one thing the world doesn't need it's yet another manifesto.

Our suggestion is: think.

A fact-based instead of faith-based approach leads to solutions for most of the recurring issues of our time, from abortion to global climate change, pollution to universal health care, careful but real regulation of industry and economy, hunger, war, terror, human rights for humans not for corporations, science not religious doctrine in public schools, equal protection and prosecution under law, etc. Approach problems without glorifying stupidity, without demonizing intelligence, and answers usually come into focus.

These pages are published by Harry and Helen Highwater, happily married low-income nom de plumes and rabble-rousers from Madison, Wisconsin (with a few friends scattered around the world helping out).

We try to spotlight news that hasn't gotten enough (or appropriate) attention in American media, along with our opinions and yours.

We bang our keyboards against the wall, because it doesn't hurt as much as banging our heads.



If you're new to Unknown News,  here are some answers to frequently asked questions about the site, and answers to questions we wish you'd ask instead. Here's our RSS feed, and here's some unknown news you might have missed. If you'd like to say hello or add a comment, here's our email address. And yes, we do sell bumper stickers and other odd stuff.

We assume our readers are well-informed before they click here, so we focus on news that's generally unknown or under-reported. We're generally disinterested in such non-news as reports on what politicians might do, may do, or should do, and we don't usually mention the murders, kidnappings, house fires, auto wrecks, celebrity crap, wacky fluff, and other nonsense that's pushed real news right out of the newscasts.


Disclaimer for dummies:  Our front page is free from nudity, but we make no promise on profanity. If your surfing is monitored this site might not be safe for work, and you may be shocked, offended, or in trouble with your boss. A link doesn't imply that we agree with every sentence and every sentiment on every site we link to. We use our noggins, and suggest you use yours.

We always welcome comments from readers, and we're especially interested in hearing and considering different perspectives, so please don't be shy. All we ask is that you conduct yourself sanely and civilly, so consider yourself invited to speak your mind. Our email address and other info is on our contact page.

Please don't email us unless you're sending an original communication that you're not sending to anyone or everyone else. If you add us to your mailing list or chat group without asking us first, or if you send "Dear friend" newsletters, or "link exchange" form letters, or if you send a press release every time you add a post to your blog, you're a spammer and we'll soon block your emails. Also, as a matter of security, we don't open emails from strangers which include attachments or have any kind of programming imbedded, and we recommend a similar policy for others. If you're sending us an email, please send it in plain text only.

Subscribe to our RSS feed
Our RSS feed of Unknown News headlines is updated whenever we update the site. Click the orange button for more information, or just get the feed at   http://unknownnews.org/ RSSfeeds/dailyRSS.xml.

Subscribe to our RSS feed
(Enormous and eternal thanks to Doug at mistersquirrel.net, for setting up our RSS feed.)

Our privacy policy  has a page of its own, but the short and sweet version is: We're in favor of privacy. We make no effort to track or identify anything about visitors to our website. We never share, trade, or sell email addresses. We never send spam. We never send email, except in response to readers' queries. We never send (or open) attachments of any kind, and we delete un-opened any emails received with attachments.

Anything sent to Unknown News may be published. If you don't want it published, say so plainly. When we publish incoming emails, we edit out the sender's last name and email address — if we slip up (or if you want your full name and email address published) please let us know. Of course, if your email is unambiguously intended only to annoy, insult, or threaten us, we'll publish it with all the details and leave it on-line forever.