Welcome to UNKNOWN NEWS "News that's not known, or not known enough."
Helen & Harry Highwater's cranky weblog of news and opinion.
Is George W. Bush insane?   |   Home   |   About us   |   Contact us   |   FAQ   |   Mystery links   |   Stickers & stuff   |
 
  Is Bush insane?   Tour his 'episodes' and decide for yourself.  

Bush says 'game is over' with Hussein

by Howard Witt and Bob Kemper, Chicago Tribune

February 7, 2003

WASHINGTON — Declaring "the game is over," President Bush on Thursday said the United States would take "whatever action is necessary" to disarm Iraq now that the world has seen Washington's evidence that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein has lied about possessing weapons of mass destruction. [Reality check]

In his harshest terms yet about the crisis in the Persian Gulf, Bush rhetorically took the world to the brink of war but stopped short of declaring it. Bush said Hussein is throwing away his last chance for peace and challenged the U.N. Security Council to approve a new resolution authorizing the use of force to disarm Iraq.

"The United States, along with a growing coalition of nations, is resolved to take whatever action is necessary to defend ourselves and disarm the Iraqi regime," Bush said after meeting with Secretary of State Colin Powell, one day after Powell presented the Security Council extensive U.S. evidence of Iraq's efforts to hide its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons materials.

"Saddam Hussein has the motive and the means and the recklessness and the hatred to threaten the American people," Bush said. "Saddam Hussein will be stopped."

Even as the president spoke, the Defense Department was ordering the Army's storied 101st Airborne Division to deploy to the gulf region to join an estimated 110,000 troops already in position for a possible war. The elite rapid deployment division played a key role in the ground phase of the 1991 gulf war.

The Turkish parliament, meanwhile, voted Thursday to allow U.S. troops to renovate Turkish bases for use in a possible war. Turkish officials said they expected the parliament would also soon approve the stationing of tens of thousands of U.S. combat troops, which would permit the Pentagon to open a crucial northern front in any war against Baghdad.

With war preparations accelerating, the State Department issued a "worldwide caution" to all Americans that they faced a growing danger of attacks from terrorist groups everywhere in the world.

Bush dramatized the potential threat as he recounted Powell's evidence of Iraq's continuing weapons programs. The president warned that a single unmanned Iraqi aircraft, rigged to spray biological agents, could be launched off the American coast and "reach hundreds of miles inland."

Bush did not specify a deadline for the Security Council to act, or for his own decision whether to launch a war. But White House officials noted that the president pointedly refrained from repeating his earlier timeline of "weeks, not months," suggesting that further consultations might not last even that long.

Nor did Bush repeat that Hussein still had time to come into compliance with U.N. disarmament demands.

"Saddam Hussein was given a final chance. He is throwing that chance away," Bush said. "The dictator of Iraq is making his choice. Now the nations of the Security Council must make their own."

Powell, testifying before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said he was confident that Washington was beginning to sway skeptical allies.

After speaking with a dozen Security Council foreign ministers following his U.N. presentation, Powell said, he sensed a "shift in attitude" that Iraq can no longer be permitted to defy the world body.

"I think there might be perhaps more support for a second resolution than some might think," Powell said.

Publicly, however, the leading Security Council critics of the use of force — France, Russia and Germany — did not back down from their opposition Thursday.

"We refuse to think that war is inevitable," French President Jacques Chirac said.

But Washington's closest ally, Britain, indicated that it was preparing to introduce a Security Council resolution authorizing force shortly after chief U.N. weapons inspectors Hans Blix and Mohamed ElBaradei make their next report to the council Feb. 14.



REALITY CHECK:
Who really has weapons of mass destruction?

USA: about 10,600
and building more

Russia: about 8,400

China: about 3,000

France: about 300

Israel: about 200

UK: about 200

Pakistan: about 50

India: about 35

North Korea: perhaps 5

Iraq: nada.




Republished material is copyrighted by its original publishers.

It is reprinted by Unknown News without permission, solely for purposes of criticism, comment, and news reporting, in accordance with the Fair Use Guidelines of copyright material under § 107 of U.S.C. Title 17.

There's much more than this at Unknown News.



  Recent entries:



  Earlier entries:







|   Home   |   About us   |   Contact us   |   FAQ   |   Mystery links   |   Stickers & stuff   |

|   Big howdy   |   Disclaimer for dummies   |   Our privacy policies   |

  © 1999-2008 by Helen & Harry Highwater and the individual authors.
   
 

Subscribe to our RSS feed
  Unknown News
This is who we are,
what we do, and why we do it
.


in·sane   adj.
1 : mentally disordered : exhibiting insanity

2 : used by, typical of, or intended for insane persons (an insane asylum)

3 : ABSURD (an insane scheme for making money)
  —Merriam-Webster
in·san·i·ty   n.
1 a : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia) and usually excluding such states as mental retardation, psychoneurosis, and various character disorders

b : a mental disorder

2 : such unsoundness of mind or lack of understanding as prevents one from having the mental capacity required by law to enter into a particular relationship, status, or transaction or as removes one from criminal or civil responsibility

3 a : extreme folly or unreasonableness

b : something utterly foolish or unreasonable
  —Merriam-Webster






Disclaimer for dummies

Our front page is free from nudity and profanity, but interior pages and external links may not be safe for work, and you may be shocked, offended, or in trouble with your boss. A link doesn't imply that we agree with every sentence and every sentiment on every site we link to. We use our noggins, and suggest you use yours.

Anything sent to Unknown News may be published. If you don't want it published, say so plainly. Of course, we publish all incoming hate mail.

Unknown News is more fun and more informative with your participation, so please don't be shy. Consider yourself invited to speak your mind.

You can contact Helen & Harry at <unknownnews at inbox.com>. If that address ever fails, check our contact page for our alternate email addresses.

We always welcome dialogue for publication, and we're especially interested in hearing and considering different perspectives. All we ask is that you conduct yourself sanely and civilly. For the most productive dialogue, it helps if you'll cite the specific article or concept we've gotten wrong.

But please, don't email us unless you're really and truly, honestly, actually trying to send a communication you're not sending to anyone or everyone else.

When we publish incoming emails, we usually edit out the sender's last name, email address, or anything else that would tend to uniquely identify the author (if we slip up, please let us know). But if your email is unambiguously intended only to annoy, insult, or threaten us, we'll publish all the details, and leave it on-line forever.

 

You can help

We try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor and this site eats a lot of time
and especially money. Just a buck or two can make all the difference and help keep Unknown News alive.

Donations        Sponsorships
Stickers and stuff for sale
Subscriptions        Wish list
Thank you