Welcome to UNKNOWN NEWS "News that's not known, or not known enough."
Helen & Harry Highwater's cranky weblog of news and opinion.
Is George W. Bush insane?   |   Home   |   About us   |   Contact us   |   FAQ   |   Mystery links   |   Stickers & stuff   |
 
  Is Bush insane?   Tour his 'episodes' and decide for yourself.  

Bush says "We found the weapons of mass destruction"


"We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories ... and we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, we found them."
--George W. Bush

Note from Unknown News: This inexplicable quote is inexplicably buried in the article's 18th paragraph.


Iraq repercussions trouble top advisers

by John Walcott, San Jose Mercury-News

May 31, 2003

WASHINGTON --Some of President Bush's top advisers, who had hoped the war in Iraq would be the turning point in the battle against terrorism and the centerpiece of the president's re-election campaign, fear it is instead becoming a political, diplomatic and military mess.

"The postwar period in Iraq is messy. We haven't found what we said we'd find there and there are unpleasant questions about assumptions we made and intelligence we had," said a senior national security official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. "If many more months go by and our troops are still there, the Iraqis are still fighting each other and us, and we still haven't found any WMD" --weapons of mass destruction -- "there will be hell to pay."

The situation in Iraq could rebound quickly, especially if U.S. forces restore power, water, health care and other services; revive the nation's battered oil industry; and unite feuding Kurds, Shiites, Sunnis and tribes into some sort of civil authority.

But for now, U.S. troops in Iraq are the targets of anger and ambushes instead of being greeted as liberators, as some Pentagon officials had expected.

Eleven Americans died this week from enemy action and accidents, and some of their civilian leaders now privately admit that the relatively small force that quickly overwhelmed the Iraqi military is too small to restore order in a nation the size of California.

The U.S. attempt to hand the country over to an Iraqi civilian administration isn't faring much better, and Bush is expected to meet with L. Paul Bremer, the top U.S. civilian in Iraq, in Qatar on Wednesday to discuss overhauling the American administration in Baghdad for the second time in a month. A top U.S. official Friday said Bremer's predecessor, retired Army Gen. Jay Garner, had failed, adding: "We lost a month because of Garner."

Critics in Congress and some within the government now suspect that a third problem, potentially the most serious of all, helps to explain the unexpected difficulties.

Much of the administration's public rationale for the war, and much of its planning for the war and its aftermath, these critics say, appears to have been based on fabricated or exaggerated intelligence that was fed to civilian officials in the Pentagon by Iraqi exiles eager for the United States to oust Saddam Hussein.

The exiles, intelligence officials said, told Pentagon officials, among other things, that many Iraqi Shiites would welcome American troops as liberators, that some key Iraqi generals would surrender their units and that Saddam had sent a key operative to work with a small Islamist group, Ansar al-Islam, that had ties to Al-Qaida.

Officials in the CIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency and the State Department all warned repeatedly that past experience with the exiles, led by Ahmed Chalabi and his Iraqi National Congress, indicated that their intelligence was unreliable at best.

But the intelligence information and Iraqi defectors supplied by the Iraqi National Congress were taken seriously in two important places: the New York Times and a special intelligence group set up by Undersecretary of Defense for Policy Douglas Feith.

The Iraqi National Congress, U.S. intelligence officials said, bypassed skeptics in the CIA and DIA and fed the same information about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction and links to Al-Qaida to the Times and the Pentagon, so Pentagon officials would confirm what the nation's most influential newspaper was hearing and the newspaper would confirm what the Pentagon was hearing.

An internal Times e-mail reported by the Washington Post said Chalabi "has provided most of the front-page exclusives on WMD to our paper" and added that a team of U.S. troops searching for chemical and biological weapons in Iraq was "using Chalabi's intel [intelligence] and document network for its own WMD work."

Doubts about the administration's assertions that Saddam had hidden stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and established ties to Osama bin Laden's Al-Qaida terrorist organization have been growing almost daily since the war ended, as U.S. troops have failed to find either the weapons or ties to terrorism.

The senior Marine general in Iraq said Friday that extensive searches had failed to locate any chemical weapons.

"It was a surprise to me then -- it remains a surprise to me now -- that we have not uncovered weapons," Lt. Gen. James Conway, the commander of the 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, told reporters at the Pentagon in a video teleconference.

"Believe me, it's not for lack of trying. We've been to virtually every ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're simply not there," Conway said.

Bush, however, told a Polish television network: "We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories ... and we'll find more weapons as time goes on. But for those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, we found them."

CIA officials Wednesday said U.S. troops in Iraq had found two mobile laboratories that analysts concluded were intended to make biological weapons, but they said the labs contained no evidence that the Iraqis had actually produced such weapons.

In an interview in the upcoming issue of Vanity Fair magazine, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, a leading proponent of the war, cast some doubt on whether administration officials were convinced that Iraq had secret stocks of nerve gas and anthrax bacteria, or whether they merely seized on the issue as a way to build support for the war.

"The truth is that for reasons that have a lot to do with the U.S. government bureaucracy, we settled on the one issue that everyone could agree on, which was weapons of mass destruction as the core reason," Wolfowitz said, according to a text released by the Pentagon.

Another senior official, who agreed to speak only on the condition of anonymity, said Wolfowitz's remark was accurate: CIA and State Department analysts, he said, sharply disputed the Pentagon's claim that Saddam had forged links to Al-Qaida, but everyone agreed that Iraq probably had not destroyed all its chemical and biological weapons.

However, the official said Wolfowitz's "choice of words, if it's being reported accurately, is probably one that Paul now regrets."

Another top official, who also agreed to speak only without attribution because, he said, "talking out of school is frowned upon at the White House," said White House political director Karl Rove and other officials were displeased by the report of Wolfowitz's remarks because they feared it would undermine public support for the war.

In Europe, the account of Wolfowitz's remarks revived suspicions that the administration had deliberately misled the world about Iraq. Meanwhile, Bush was headed to Poland, Russia and an economic summit meeting in France.

"The charge of deception is inescapable," said Germany's largest newspaper, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung.


Published by
San Jose Mercury-News

Republished material is copyrighted by its original publishers.

It is reprinted by Unknown News without permission, solely for purposes of criticism, comment, and news reporting, in accordance with the Fair Use Guidelines of copyright material under § 107 of U.S.C. Title 17.

There's much more than this at Unknown News.



  Recent entries:



  Earlier entries:







|   Home   |   About us   |   Contact us   |   FAQ   |   Mystery links   |   Stickers & stuff   |

|   Big howdy   |   Disclaimer for dummies   |   Our privacy policies   |

  © 1999-2008 by Helen & Harry Highwater and the individual authors.
   
 

Subscribe to our RSS feed
  Unknown News
This is who we are,
what we do, and why we do it
.


in·sane   adj.
1 : mentally disordered : exhibiting insanity

2 : used by, typical of, or intended for insane persons (an insane asylum)

3 : ABSURD (an insane scheme for making money)
  —Merriam-Webster
in·san·i·ty   n.
1 a : a deranged state of the mind usually occurring as a specific disorder (as schizophrenia) and usually excluding such states as mental retardation, psychoneurosis, and various character disorders

b : a mental disorder

2 : such unsoundness of mind or lack of understanding as prevents one from having the mental capacity required by law to enter into a particular relationship, status, or transaction or as removes one from criminal or civil responsibility

3 a : extreme folly or unreasonableness

b : something utterly foolish or unreasonable
  —Merriam-Webster






Disclaimer for dummies

Our front page is free from nudity and profanity, but interior pages and external links may not be safe for work, and you may be shocked, offended, or in trouble with your boss. A link doesn't imply that we agree with every sentence and every sentiment on every site we link to. We use our noggins, and suggest you use yours.

Anything sent to Unknown News may be published. If you don't want it published, say so plainly. Of course, we publish all incoming hate mail.

Unknown News is more fun and more informative with your participation, so please don't be shy. Consider yourself invited to speak your mind.

You can contact Helen & Harry at <unknownnews at inbox.com>. If that address ever fails, check our contact page for our alternate email addresses.

We always welcome dialogue for publication, and we're especially interested in hearing and considering different perspectives. All we ask is that you conduct yourself sanely and civilly. For the most productive dialogue, it helps if you'll cite the specific article or concept we've gotten wrong.

But please, don't email us unless you're really and truly, honestly, actually trying to send a communication you're not sending to anyone or everyone else.

When we publish incoming emails, we usually edit out the sender's last name, email address, or anything else that would tend to uniquely identify the author (if we slip up, please let us know). But if your email is unambiguously intended only to annoy, insult, or threaten us, we'll publish all the details, and leave it on-line forever.

 

You can help

We try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor and this site eats a lot of time
and especially money. Just a buck or two can make all the difference and help keep Unknown News alive.

Donations        Sponsorships
Stickers and stuff for sale
Subscriptions        Wish list
Thank you