"Your story claiming US forces are using napalm in Iraq, is patently false.
"The US took napalm out of service in the early 1970s.
"We completed destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm."
—Jeff A. Davis,
Lieutenant Commander,
US Navy,
Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense
|
US official said it was "patently false,"
but US forces did use napalm in Iraqby Helen & Harry Highwater, Unknown News Aug. 8, 2003
On a publicity page at the US Air Force's web site (http://www.af.mil/news/opscenter/OIF_talker.shtml), the following lie was on-line at this writing (8/8/2003, 2:35 PM CST)...Disinformation Alert
Report: U.S. military used napalm in the bombing of Iraq (Sydney Morning Herald, March 22, 2003)
Ground Truth: The United States took napalm out of service in the early 1970s. We completed destruction of all 2.7 million gallons of napalm on April 4, 2001. The claims that we are using napalm in Iraq are patently false.We have contacted the Sydney Morning Herald and asked for a correction. They tell us they are pulling the story.
Published by the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs.
That's a lie.
Lt. Cdr. Jeff Davis, a spokesman from the US Secretary of Defense's office, responded to the the Herald's article by complaining to the newspaper:"Your story claiming US forces are using napalm in Iraq, is patently false. The US took napalm out of service in the early 1970s. We completed destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm."
Davis's statement is itself patently false: it's another big fat lie.
Napalm, says the e-library encyclopedia, is "incendiary material ... based on a mixture of gasoline, sometimes mixed with other petroleum fuels, and a thickening agent. The thickener, to which the term napalm was originally applied, turns the mixture into a thick jelly that flows under pressure, as when shot from a flame thrower, and sticks to a target as it burns. One of the first thickeners used was an aluminum soap (a salt of aluminum and certain fatty acids). Later thickeners have been based on polystyrene and similar polymers."
The chemical make-up of napalm used in Iraq is barely distinguishable from napalm used in Vietnam. It has the same grotesque, deadly effect on its victims. It is still called napalm by the American troops who handle it.
The difference between napalm and what was used in Iraq is like the difference between Tide brand detergent and new, improved Tide detergent. If you're using new and improved Tide, it's not "patently false" to report that you're using Tide. It's patently false to say that you're not.
The Herald had the facts right, and the US military was lying. It happens often, but it isn't often quite so obvious.
When the Herald received the US military's complaints about the first article, they briefly yanked three paragraphs from their on-line edition — but only for a few hours. Editors then returned the article to its original form, with the Pentagon's position quoted at the end.
Here's the newspaper's original story from last March (on the left, below, with bold type indicating the sections that were briefly deleted by the Herald), with the military spokesman's lie at the bottom, as inserted by the newspaper in response. And on the right side below is the Herald's coverage from today —
'Dead bodies are everywhere'
by Lindsay Murdoch
Sydney Morning Herald
March 22, 2003
There was little initial resistance as the United States Marines swept into southern Iraq early yesterday. One of the first encounters of the ground war was more like a massacre than a fight.
The Iraqi gunners fired first, soon after United States President George Bush announced the attack on Saddam Hussein was under way.
It was a fatal mistake.
The Iraqi artillery unit, preparing for the American invasion, had tested the range by firing registering shots at a likely spot where the American tanks would cross from Kuwait. US radar picked up the incoming shells and pinpointed their source.
Within hours, the Iraqi gunners and their Russian-made 122mm howitzers were destroyed as the Americans unleashed an artillery barrage that shook the ground and lit up the night sky.
"Dead bodies are everywhere," a US officer reported by radio.
Later in the day, the American firepower was turned on Safwan Hill, an Iraqi military observation post a couple of kilometres across the border. About six hours after US marines and their 155mm howitzer guns pulled up at the border, they opened up with a deafening barrage. Safwan Hill went up in a huge fireball and the Iraqi observation post was obliterated.
"I pity anybody who's in there," a marine sergeant said. "We told them to surrender."
The destruction of Safwan Hill was a priority because it had sophisticated surveillance equipment near the main highway that runs from Kuwait up to Basra and then Baghdad. The attacking forces could not attempt to cross the border unless it was destroyed.
Marine Cobra helicopter gunships firing Hellfire missiles swept in low from the south. Then the marine howitzers, with a range of 30 kilometres, opened a sustained barrage over the next eight hours. They were supported by US Navy aircraft which dropped 40,000 pounds of explosives and napalm, a US officer told the Herald. But a navy spokesman in Washington, Lieutenant Commander Danny Hernandez, denied that napalm — which was banned by a United Nations convention in 1980 — was used.
"We don't even have that in our arsenal," he said.
The navy admitted to using napalm as late as 1993 in training exercises on the island of Vieques in Puerto Rico, but the last cannister of a vast US naval stockpile was reportedly destroyed in a public ceremony in April 2001.
When dawn broke on Safwan Hill, all that could be seen on top of it was a single antenna amid the smoke. The marines then moved forward, their officers saying they were determined to push on as quickly as possible for Baghdad.
The first air strike on Baghdad, and Mr Bush's announcement that the war was under way, appeared to catch US officers in the Kuwait desert by surprise. The attack was originally planned for early today. But the US officers did not seem worried.
Within hours of Mr Bush's announcement, a vast army of tanks, trucks, bulldozers and heavy guns was surging to positions on Iraq's border.
Despite the early indications that Iraqi forces were showing little resistance, some US Marine units halted 200 metres inside Iraqi territory last night as they came under fire from anti-tank missiles and rifles. They called in artillery to deal with the threat.
|
Napalm by another name: Pentagon denial goes up in flames
by Ben Cubby
Sydney Morning Herald
Aug. 9, 2003
The United States military has admitted it used napalm-type weapons in Iraq.
A Pentagon spokesman had told the Herald it did not have any stocks of napalm, but it seems the denial was a quibble.
The Pentagon no longer officially uses the brand-name Napalm, a combination of naphthalene and palmitate, but a similar substance known as fuel-gel mixture contained in Mark-77 fire bombs was dropped on Iraqi troops near the Iraq-Kuwait border at the start of the recent war.
"I can confirm that Mark-77 fire bombs were used in that general area," said Colonel Mike Daily, of the US Marine Corps.
Colonel Daily said that US stocks of Vietnam-era napalm had been phased out, but that the Mark-77s had "similar destructive characteristics".
On March 22 a Herald correspondent, Lindsay Murdoch, travelling with US marines, reported that napalm was used in an attack on Iraqi troops at Safwan Hill, near the Kuwait border.
His account was based on statements by two US marines officers on the ground. But Lieutenant-Commander Jeff Davis, from the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Defence, called Murdoch's story "patently false". "The US took napalm out of service in the 1970s. We completed the destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm," Commander Davis said.
He was apparently referring to Vietnam-era Napalm-B, which consisted of inflammable fuel thickened with polystyrene and benzene. The inflammable fuel in Mark-77 fire bombs is thickened with slightly different chemicals, and is believed to contain oxidisers.
Neither weapon technically contains napalm.
A Pentagon official told Agence France-Presse on Thursday that US forces used the Mark-77 fire bombs against Iraqi forces in their drive towards Baghdad and defended their use as legal and necessary.
The official, who did not wish to be identified, said that US marines jets dropped the fire bombs at least once to destroy Iraqi positions at Safwan.
The official told AFP: "It is like this: you've got [an] enemy that's hard to get at. And it will save your own lives to use it." There were no international conventions against it, the official said.
Marines used the napalm-like bombs on at least two other occasions during the drive to Baghdad, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported this week.
"The generals love napalm," the paper quoted Colonel Randolph Alles, the commander of Marine Air Group 11, as saying. "It has a big psychological effect."
Napalm was banned by a United Nations convention in 1980, but the US did not sign the agreement. The US military considers the use of Mark-77 weapons to be legal.
A spokeswoman for Rock Island Arsenal in Illinois said it was producing a further 500 Mark-77s for the marines. She said she did not consider them napalm bombs, but they are still referred to as napalm in some US documents.
Published by
Sydney [Australia] Morning Herald
|
The Pentagon subsequently issued a statement to the Herald:
Your story ('Dead bodies everywhere', by Lindsay Murdoch, March 22, 2003) claiming US forces are using napalm in Iraq, is patently false. The US took napalm out of service in the early 1970s. We completed destruction of our last batch of napalm on April 4, 2001, and no longer maintain any stocks of napalm. —Jeff A. Davis, Lieutenant Commander, US Navy, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense.
Published by
Sydney [Australia] Morning Herald
There's much more than this at Unknown News.
|
Return to today's Unknown News
This material is copyrighted by its original publisher.It is reprinted by Unknown News without permission, solely for purposes of criticism, comment, and news reporting, in accordance with the Fair Use Guidelines of copyright material under § 107 of U.S.C. Title 17.
|
| You can help |
We
try not to whine too much or too loudly, but we are poor
and this site eats a lot of money and time.
We
couldn't do it without the help of our volunteers. And for
those who can't afford the time, giving just a buck or two
can make all the difference and keep Unknown News alive.
|
Talk
to Us |
Archives |
| If
you have something to say, we'd love to hear
from you. |
Click
here for archives of recent editions of Unknown News |
|
